RFR: 8224162: assert(profile.count() == 0) failed: sanity in InlineTree::is_not_reached

Mon May 20 08:12:46 UTC 2019

The failure is still reproduced with patch. I attached full hs_err to the bug.

hs_err
#
# A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment:
#
#  Internal Error (open/src/hotspot/share/opto/bytecodeInfo.cpp:343), pid=3096, tid=3128
#  assert(profile_count == 0) failed: sanity
#
# JRE version: Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (13.0) (fastdebug build 13-internal+0-2019-05-18-0457052.lmesnik.null)
# Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug 13-internal+0-2019-05-18-0457052.lmesnik.null, mixed mode, sharing, tiered, compressed oops, g1 gc, linux-amd64)
# Problematic frame:
# V  [libjvm.so+0x6cbf6c]  InlineTree::is_not_reached(ciMethod*, ciMethod*, int, ciCallProfile&) [clone .constprop.153]+0xbc
#
# Core dump will be written. Default location: Core dumps may be processed with "/usr/libexec/abrt-hook-ccpp %s %c %p %u %g %t e %P %I %h" (or dumping to /scratch/lmesnik/ws/ks-apps/build/linux-x64/test-support/jtreg_closed_test_hotspot_jtreg_applications_kitchensink_Kit\
chensink14D_java/scratch/0/core.3096)
#
# If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit:
#   http://bugreport.java.com/bugreport/crash.jsp
#

---------------  S U M M A R Y ------------

Command Line: -Xbootclasspath/a:. -XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+WhiteBoxAPI -XX:MaxRAMPercentage=12 -XX:+DeoptimizeALot -XX:MaxRAMPercentage=50 -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError -XX:+CrashOnOutOfMemoryError -Djava.net.preferIPv6Addresses=false -XX:+DisplayVMOutputToS\
tderr -XX:+UsePerfData -Xlog:gc*,gc+heap=debug:gc.log:uptime,timemillis,level,tags -XX:+DisableExplicitGC -XX:+StartAttachListener -XX:NativeMemoryTracking=detail -XX:+FlightRecorder --add-exports=java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAMED --add-opens=java.base/java.lang=ALL-UNNAME\
D --add-exports=java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.parsers=ALL-UNNAMED --add-exports=java.xml/com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.util=ALL-UNNAMED -Djava.io.tmpdir=/scratch/lmesnik/ws/ks-apps/build/linux-x64/test-support/jtreg_closed_test_hotspot_jtreg_applicatio\
ns_kitchensink_Kitchensink14D_java/scratch/0/java.io.tmpdir -Duser.home=/scratch/lmesnik/ws/ks-apps/build/linux-x64/test-support/jtreg_closed_test_hotspot_jtreg_applications_kitchensink_Kitchensink14D_java/scratch/0/user.home -agentpath:/scratch/lmesnik/ws/ks-apps/build/\
linux-x64/images/test/hotspot/jtreg/native/libJvmtiStressModule.so applications.kitchensink.process.stress.Main /scratch/lmesnik/ws/ks-apps/build/linux-x64/test-support/jtreg_closed_test_hotspot_jtreg_applications_kitchensink_Kitchensink14D_java/scratch/0/kitchensink.fin\
al.properties

Host: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz, 4 cores, 14G, Oracle Linux Server release 7.5
Time: Sun May 19 05:15:11 2019 PDT elapsed time: 111312 seconds (1d 6h 55m 12s)

---------------  T H R E A D  ---------------

Current thread (0x00002ae4e83bc000):  JavaThread "C2 CompilerThread0" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=3128, stack(0x00002ae522de2000,0x00002ae522ee3000)]

Current CompileTask:
C2:111312036 146944       4       spec.benchmarks.derby.DerbyHarness$Client::handleResultSet (77 bytes)

Stack: [0x00002ae522de2000,0x00002ae522ee3000],  sp=0x00002ae522edf650,  free space=1013k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, A=aot compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
V  [libjvm.so+0x6cbf6c]  InlineTree::is_not_reached(ciMethod*, ciMethod*, int, ciCallProfile&) [clone .constprop.153]+0xbc
V  [libjvm.so+0x6d12e0]  InlineTree::ok_to_inline(ciMethod*, JVMState*, ciCallProfile&, WarmCallInfo*, bool&)+0x1950
V  [libjvm.so+0xb6e075]  Compile::call_generator(ciMethod*, int, bool, JVMState*, bool, float, ciKlass*, bool, bool)+0x905
V  [libjvm.so+0xb6f6b9]  Parse::do_call()+0x469
V  [libjvm.so+0x1441b70]  Parse::do_one_bytecode()+0xff0
V  [libjvm.so+0x1432520]  Parse::do_one_block()+0x650
V  [libjvm.so+0x1432a23]  Parse::do_all_blocks()+0x113
V  [libjvm.so+0x14348e4]  Parse::Parse(JVMState*, ciMethod*, float)+0xc54
V  [libjvm.so+0x803d0c]  ParseGenerator::generate(JVMState*)+0x18c
V  [libjvm.so+0x9c08b4]  Compile::Compile(ciEnv*, C2Compiler*, ciMethod*, int, bool, bool, bool, DirectiveSet*)+0xe74
V  [libjvm.so+0x801d9d]  C2Compiler::compile_method(ciEnv*, ciMethod*, int, DirectiveSet*)+0x10d
V  [libjvm.so+0x9cd17d]  CompileBroker::invoke_compiler_on_method(CompileTask*)+0x46d
V  [libjvm.so+0x9ce1d8]  CompileBroker::compiler_thread_loop()+0x418
V  [libjvm.so+0x16c0baa]  JavaThread::thread_main_inner()+0x26a
V  [libjvm.so+0x16c9267]  JavaThread::run()+0x227
V  [libjvm.so+0x16c62f6]  Thread::call_run()+0xf6
V  [libjvm.so+0x13e0d5e]  thread_native_entry(Thread*)+0x10e

Leonid

> On May 18, 2019, at 5:40 PM, Jie Fu <fujie at loongson.cn> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Vladimir Ivanov and Vladimir Kozlov for your review.
> Let's wait for Leonid's test result.
> 
> Thanks.
> Best regards,
> Jie
> 
> On 2019年05月19日 00:15, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Hi Jie,
>> 
>> So the counter was incremented while this code is executed. And you fixed it by caching initial value.
>> Looks good.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Vladimir
>> 
>> On 5/17/19 6:37 PM, Jie Fu wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> JBS:    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8224162
>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jiefu/8224162/webrev.00/
>>> 
>>> I'm sorry to introduce this assertion failure.
>>> Please review the suggested fix and give me some advice.
>>> 
>>> Leonid, could you please help to test the patch?
>>> I don't have the reproducer you mentioned in the JBS.
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot.
>>> Best regards,
>>> Jie
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 