[PING] Re: RFR(L): 8213084: Rework and enhance Print[Opto]Assembly output

Tobias Hartmann tobias.hartmann at oracle.com
Tue May 21 10:38:12 UTC 2019


Hi Lutz,

this looks good to me.

Best regards,
Tobias

On 20.05.19 10:22, Schmidt, Lutz wrote:
> Hi Vladimir, 
> 
> I appreciate the time you spent making this change "push-worthy". Thank you for reviewing it!
> 
> I am now hoping for a second reviewer to set aside some time and have a look. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Lutz
> 
> On 17.05.19, 16:48, "Vladimir Kozlov" <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>     Good.
>     
>     Thanks
>     Vladimir
>     
>     > On May 17, 2019, at 6:19 AM, Schmidt, Lutz <lutz.schmidt at sap.com> wrote:
>     > 
>     > Hi Vladimir, 
>     > here is what I changed to overcome the ZERO build issues:
>     > 
>     > ----------- 8< ----------------
>     > diff -r c0568c492760 src/hotspot/cpu/zero/assembler_zero.hpp
>     > --- a/src/hotspot/cpu/zero/assembler_zero.hpp    Fri May 17 14:11:44 2019 +0200
>     > +++ b/src/hotspot/cpu/zero/assembler_zero.hpp    Fri May 17 14:14:06 2019 +0200
>     > @@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
>     > 
>     >  public:
>     >   void pd_patch_instruction(address branch, address target, const char* file, int line);
>     > +
>     > +  //---<  calculate length of instruction  >---
>     > +  static unsigned int instr_len(unsigned char *instr) { return 1; }
>     > +
>     > +  //---<  longest instructions  >---
>     > +  static unsigned int instr_maxlen() { return 1; }
>     > };
>     > 
>     > class MacroAssembler : public Assembler {
>     > diff -r c0568c492760 src/hotspot/share/compiler/abstractDisassembler.cpp
>     > --- a/src/hotspot/share/compiler/abstractDisassembler.cpp    Fri May 17 14:11:44 2019 +0200
>     > +++ b/src/hotspot/share/compiler/abstractDisassembler.cpp    Fri May 17 14:14:06 2019 +0200
>     > @@ -61,6 +61,9 @@
>     > bool AbstractDisassembler::_show_bytes  = false; // set "true" to see what's in memory bit by bit
>     >                                                  // might prove cumbersome because instr_len is hard to find on x86
>     > #endif
>     > +#if defined(ZERO)
>     > +bool AbstractDisassembler::_show_bytes  = false; // set "true" to see what's in memory bit by bit
>     > +#endif
>     > 
>     > // Return #bytes printed. Callers may use that for output alignment.
>     > // Print instruction address, and offset from blob begin.
>     > ----------- >8 ----------------
>     > 
>     > This delta is contained as the only change in the new webrev#04 which is based on the current (13:10 GMT) jdk/jdk repo:
>     > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8213084.04/
>     > 
>     > Regards,
>     > Lutz
>     > 
>     > 
>     > On 16.05.19, 21:40, "Vladimir Kozlov" <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>     > 
>     >    I am not sure about exact parameters but I see build testing uses next:
>     > 
>     >    configure --with-jvm-variants=zero --with-jvm-features=-shenandoahgc
>     > 
>     >    Vladimir
>     > 
>     >>    On 5/16/19 12:22 PM, Schmidt, Lutz wrote:
>     >> Hi Vladimir,
>     >> 
>     >> thanks for the extensive testing. And sorry for me neglecting ZERO. I will add a dummy instr_len() function. I saw another potential issue. There is no static initializer for AbstractDisassembler::_show_bytes. What is the correct macro to test for ZERO? Is it just "#ifdef ZERO"?
>     >> 
>     >> I will prepare a new webrev with just these two additions as delta. But it'll be not before Friday morning, my time.
>     >> 
>     >> Thanks,
>     >> Lutz
>     >> 
>     >> On 16.05.19, 20:38, "Vladimir Kozlov" <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>     >> 
>     >>     linux-x64-zero build is broke:
>     >> 
>     >>     workspace/open/src/hotspot/share/compiler/abstractDisassembler.cpp:332:42: error: 'instr_len' is not a member of 'Assembler'
>     >>           int instr_size_in_bytes = Assembler::instr_len(pos);
>     >>                                                ^~~~~~~~~
>     >>     Other builds and testing are good.
>     >> 
>     >>     Thanks,
>     >>     Vladimir
>     >> 
>     >>>     On 5/16/19 9:47 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>     >>> Nice.
>     >>> 
>     >>> I submitted our tier1-3 testing.
>     >>> 
>     >>> Thanks,
>     >>> Vladimir
>     >>> 
>     >>>> On 5/16/19 2:55 AM, Schmidt, Lutz wrote:
>     >>>> Hi Vladimir,
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> sorry for the delayed reaction on your comments.
>     >>>> 
>     >>>>  - now it reads "static unsigned int instr_len()". This change added cpu/s390/assembler_s390.inline.hpp to the list
>     >>>> of modified files.
>     >>>> - testing from my side will be via the submit repo (BuildId: 2019-05-15-1543576.lutz.schmidt.source, no failures). In
>     >>>> addition, I added the patch to our internal builds so that our inhouse testing will cover it (no issues detected last
>     >>>> night).
>     >>>>  - All the "hsdis-" prefixes in the PrintAssemblyOptions are gone, as are "print-pc" and "print-bytes". The latter
>     >>>> two were legacy anyway. I kept them for compatibility. But now, without the prefix, there is no compatibility anymore.
>     >>>>  - Options parsing improvement will be done in a separate effort. I have created JDK-8223765 for that.
>     >>>>  - there is a new webrev, based on the current jdk/jdk repo: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8213084.03/
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> ~thartmann:
>     >>>> The disabled code in disassembler_s390.cpp is something I would like to have. So far, I could not find time to make it
>     >>>> work reliably. I would like to keep it in as a reminder and a template to build on.
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> Thanks,
>     >>>> Lutz
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> On 10.05.19, 23:16, "Vladimir Kozlov" <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>     >>>> 
>     >>>>     Hi Lutz,
>     >>>>     My comments are inlined below.
>     >>>>>     On 5/10/19 8:44 AM, Schmidt, Lutz wrote:
>     >>>>> Thank you, Vladimir!
>     >>>>> Please find my comments inline and let me know what you think.
>     >>>>> A new webrev with all the updates is here: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8213084.02/
>     >>>>     Found one more I missed last time:
>     >>>>     assembler_s390.hpp: still singed return (on other platforms it was converted to unsigned):
>     >>>>       static int instr_len(unsigned char *instr);
>     >>>>> Please note: the webrev is not based on the most current jdk/jdk! I do not like the idea to "hg pull -u" to a
>     >>>> repo state which is known to be broken. Once jdk/jdk is repaired, I will update the webrev in-place (provided there
>     >>>> were no serious clashes) and sent a short note.
>     >>>>     NP. Please, provide final webrev when you can so that I can run these changes through our testing to
>     >>>>     make sure no issues are present (especially in builds).
>     >>>>> Regards,
>     >>>>> Lutz
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>> On 09.05.19, 21:30, "Vladimir Kozlov" <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     Hi Lutz,
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     Thank you for doing this great work.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     I have just small comments:
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     x86_64.ad - empty change.
>     >>>>> File contains whitespace changes for formatting. Not visible in webrev.
>     >>>>     Okay.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     nmethod.cpp - LUCY?
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     +        st->print_cr("LUCY: NULL-oop");
>     >>>>>     +   tty->print("LUCY NULL-oop");
>     >>>>> Oops. Leftover debugging output. Removed. Reads "NULL-oop" now.
>     >>>>     Okay.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     nmethod.cpp - use PTR64_FORMAT instead of '0x%016lx'.
>     >>>>> Changed.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     vmreg.cpp - Use INTPTR_FORMAT instead of %ld for value().
>     >>>>> Changed.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     disassembler.* - LUCY_OBSOLETE?
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     +#if defined(LUCY_OBSOLETE)  // Used in SAPJVM only
>     >>>>> This is fancy code to step backwards in CISC instructions. Used to print a +/- range around a given instruction
>     >>>> address. Works reasonably well on s390, will probably not work at all for x86. I could not finally decide to kick it
>     >>>> out. But now I did. It's gone.
>     >>>>     Okay.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     compilerDefinitions.hpp - I don't see where tier_digit() is used.
>     >>>>> I'm surprised myself. Introduced it and then made it obsolete. It's gone.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     disassembler.cpp - PrintAssemblyOptions. Why you need to have 'hsdis-' in all options values? You
>     >>>>>     need to check for invalid value and print help output in such case - it will be very useful if you
>     >>>>>     forgot a value spelling. Also add line for 'help' value.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>> The hsdis- prefix existed before I started my work. I just kept it to not hurt anybody's feelings__. Actually,
>     >>>> the prefix has a minor practical use. It guards the many "if (strstr(..." instructions from being executed if there is
>     >>>> no use. I'm personally not emotionally attached to the hsdis- prefix. I can remove it if you (and the other reviewers)
>     >>>> like. Not changed as of now. Awaiting your input.
>     >>>>     It is a pain to type long values and annoying to type the same prefix. I think hsdis- prefix is
>     >>>>     useless because PrintAssemblyOptions is used only for disassembler and there are no values which
>     >>>>     don't have hsdis- prefix. This is not performance critical code to have a guard (check prefix).
>     >>>>     And an other commented new line:
>     >>>>     +  // ost->print_cr("PrintAssemblyOptions='%s'", options());
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>> Printing help text: There is an option (hsdis-help) to request help text printout. >
>     >>>>> Options parsing doesn't exist here. It's just string comparisons. If one of the predefined strings is found -
>     >>>> fine. If not - so what. If you would like to detect unrecognized input, process_options() needs significantly more
>     >>>> intelligence. I can do that, but would like to do it in a separate effort. Your opinion?
>     >>>>     Got it. I forgot that PrintAssemblyOptions flag accepts string with *list* of values - you can't use
>     >>>>     if-else or switch without complicating the code.
>     >>>>     I noticed that PrintAssemblyOptions is defined as ccstr. Why it is not ccstrlist which should be use
>     >>>>     here? I don't think next comment is correct for ccstr type:
>     >>>>     http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/file/ef73702a906e/src/hotspot/share/compiler/disassembler.cpp#l190
>     >>>>     It would be nice to fix it but you can do it later if you don't want to add more changes.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     Do you need next commented lines:
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     disassembler.cpp -
>     >>>>>     +//  ptrdiff_t     _offset;
>     >>>>> Deleted.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     +//      Output suppressed because it messes up disassembly.
>     >>>>>     +//      output()->print_cr("[Disassembling for mach='%s']", (const char*)arg);
>     >>>>> Uncommented, would like to keep it. Made the if condition permanently false.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     disassembler_s390.cpp -
>     >>>>>     +//    st->fill_to(((st->position()+3*tsize-1)/tsize)*tsize);
>     >>>>> Deleted.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     compile.cpp -
>     >>>>>     +//  st->print("#  ");  _tf->dump_on(st);  st->cr();
>     >>>>> Uncommented.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     abstractDisassembler.cpp -
>     >>>>>     //                  st->print("0x%016lx", *((julong*)here));
>     >>>>>                        st->print("0x%016lx", *((uintptr_t*)here));
>     >>>>>     //                  st->print("0x%08x%08x", *((juint*)here), *((juint*)(here+4)));
>     >>>>> Commented lines are gone.
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     abstractDisassembler.cpp - may be explicit cast (byte*)?:
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>              st->print("%2.2x", *byte);
>     >>>>>              st->print("%2.2x", *pos);
>     >>>>>                      st->print("0x%02x", *here);
>     >>>>> Didn't see the need because the pointers are char* (= address) anyway. And, according to cppreference.com,
>     >>>> std::byte is a C++17 feature. We are not there yet.
>     >>>>     okay
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     PTR64_FORMAT ?:
>     >>>>>                        st->print("0x%016lx", *((uintptr_t*)here));
>     >>>>> I'm kind of hesitant on that. Nice output alignment clearly depends on this to output exactly 18 characters.
>     >>>> Changed other occurrences, so I changed this one as well.
>     >>>>     Thanks,
>     >>>>     Vladimir
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>     Thanks,
>     >>>>>     Vladimir
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     On 5/8/19 8:31 AM, Schmidt, Lutz wrote:
>     >>>>>> Dear Community,
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>> may I please request comments and reviews for this change? Thank you!
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>> I have created a new webrev which is based on the current jdk/jdk repo. There was some merge effort. The
>     >>>> code which constitutes this patch was not changed. Here's the webrev link:
>     >>>>>> https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8213084.01/
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>> Regards,
>     >>>>>> Lutz
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>> On 11.04.19, 23:24, "Schmidt, Lutz" <lutz.schmidt at sap.com> wrote:
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     Dear All,
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     this topic was discussed back in Nov/Dec 2018:
>     >>>>>>     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2018-November/031552.html
>     >>>>>>     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2018-December/031641.html
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     Purpose of the discussion was to find out if my ideas are at all regarded useful and desirable.
>     >>>>>>     The result was mixed, some pro, some con. I let the input from back then influence my work of the
>     >>>> last months. In particular, output verbosity can be controlled in a wide range now. In addition to the general
>     >>>> -XX:+Print* switches, the amount of output can be adjusted by newly introduced -XX:PrintAssemblyOptions. Here is the
>     >>>> list (with default settings):
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     PrintAssemblyOptions help:
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-print-raw       test plugin by requesting raw output (deprecated)
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-print-raw-xml   test plugin by requesting raw xml (deprecated)
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-print-pc        turn off PC printing (on by default) (deprecated)
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-print-bytes     turn on instruction byte output (deprecated)
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-show-pc            toggle printing current pc,        currently ON
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-show-offset        toggle printing current offset,    currently OFF
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-show-bytes         toggle printing instruction bytes, currently OFF
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-show-data-hex      toggle formatting data as hex,     currently ON
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-show-data-int      toggle formatting data as int,     currently OFF
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-show-data-float    toggle formatting data as float,   currently OFF
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-show-structs       toggle compiler data structures,   currently OFF
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-show-comment       toggle instruction comments,       currently OFF
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-show-block-comment toggle block comments,             currently OFF
>     >>>>>>       hsdis-align-instr        toggle instruction alignment,      currently OFF
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     Finally, I have pushed my changes to a state where I can dare to request your comments and reviews.
>     >>>> I would like to suggest and request that we first focus on the effects (i.e. the generated output) of the changes.
>     >>>> Once we got that adjusted and accepted, we can check the actual implementation and add improvements there. Sounds like
>     >>>> a plan? Here is what you get:
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     The machine code generated by the JVM can be printed in three different formats:
>     >>>>>>      - Hexadecimal.
>     >>>>>>        This is basically a hex dump of the memory range containing the code.
>     >>>>>>        This format is always available (PRODUCT and not-PRODUCT builds), regardless
>     >>>>>>        of the availability of a disassembler library. It applies to all sorts of
>     >>>>>>        code, be it blobs, stubs, compiled nmethods, ...
>     >>>>>>        This format seems useless at first glance, but it is not. In an upcoming,
>     >>>>>>        separate enhancement, the JVM will be made capable of reading files
>     >>>>>>        containing such code blocks and disassembling them post mortem. The most
>     >>>>>>        prominent example is an hs_err* file.
>     >>>>>>      - Disassembled.
>     >>>>>>        This is an assembly listing of the instructions as found in the memory range
>     >>>>>>        occupied by the blob, stub, compiled nmethod ... As a prerequisite, a suitable
>     >>>>>>        disassembler library (hsdis-<platform>.so) must be available at runtime.
>     >>>>>>        Most often, that will only be the case in test environments. If no disassembler
>     >>>>>>        library is available, hexadecimal output is used as fallback.
>     >>>>>>      - OptoAssembly.
>     >>>>>>        This is a meta code listing created only by the C2 compiler. As it is somewhat
>     >>>>>>        closer to the Java code, it may be helpful in linking assembly code to Java code.
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     All three formats can be merged with additional information, most prominently compiler-internal
>     >>>> "knowledge" about blocks, related bytecodes, statistics counters, and much more.
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     Following the code itself, compiler-internal data structures, like oop maps, relocations, scopes,
>     >>>> dependencies, exception handlers, are printed to aid in debugging.
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     The full set of information is available in non-PRODUCT builds. PRODUCT builds do not support
>     >>>> OptoAssembly output. Data structures are unavailable as well.
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     So how does the output actually look like? Here are a few small snippets (linuxx86_64) to give you
>     >>>> an idea. The complete output of an entire C2-compiled method, in multiple verbosity variants, is available here:
>     >>>>>>       http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8213084/
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     OptoAssembly output for reference (always on with PrintAssembly):
>     >>>>>>     =================================================================
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     036     B2: #   out( B7 B3 ) <- in( B1 )  Freq: 1
>     >>>>>>     036     movl    RBP, [RSI + #12 (8-bit)]        # compressed ptr ! Field: java/lang/String.value
>     >>>> (constant)
>     >>>>>>     039     movl    R11, [RBP + #12 (8-bit)]        # range
>     >>>>>>     03d     NullCheck RBP
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     03d     B3: #   out( B6 B4 ) <- in( B2 )  Freq: 0.999999
>     >>>>>>     03d     cmpl    RDX, R11        # unsigned
>     >>>>>>     040     jnb,us  B6  P=0.000000 C=5375.000000
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     PrintAssembly with no disassembler library available:
>     >>>>>>     =====================================================
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     [Code]
>     >>>>>>     [Entry Point]
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc74d1d7b20: 448b 5608 49c1 e203 493b c20f 856f 69e7 ff90 9090 9090 9090 9090 9090 9090 9090
>     >>>>>>     [Verified Entry Point]
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc74d1d7b40: 8984 2400 a0fe ff55 4883 ec20 440f be5e 1445 85db 7521 8b6e 0c44 8b5d 0c41 3bd3
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc74d1d7b60: 732c 0fb6 4415 1048 83c4 205d 4d8b 9728 0100 0041 8502 c348 8bee 8914 2444 895c
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc74d1d7b80: 2404 be4d ffff ffe8 1483 e7ff 0f0b bee5 ffff ff89 5424 04e8 0483 e7ff 0f0b bef6
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc74d1d7ba0: ffff ff89 5424 04e8 f482 e7ff 0f0b f4f4 f4f4 f4f4 f4f4 f4f4 f4f4 f4f4 f4f4 f4f4
>     >>>>>>     [Exception Handler]
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc74d1d7bc0: e95b 0df5 ffe8 0000 0000 4883 2c24 05e9 0c7d e7ff
>     >>>>>>     [End]
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     PrintAssembly with minimal verbosity:
>     >>>>>>     =====================================
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f0434b89bd6:   mov    0xc(%rsi),%ebp
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f0434b89bd9:   mov    0xc(%rbp),%r11d
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f0434b89bdd:   cmp    %r11d,%edx
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f0434b89be0:   jae    0x00007f0434b89c0e
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     PrintAssembly (previous plus code offsets from code begin):
>     >>>>>>     ===========================================================
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f63c11d7956 (+0x36):   mov    0xc(%rsi),%ebp
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f63c11d7959 (+0x39):   mov    0xc(%rbp),%r11d
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f63c11d795d (+0x3d):   cmp    %r11d,%edx
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f63c11d7960 (+0x40):   jae    0x00007f63c11d798e
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     PrintAssembly (previous plus block comments):
>     >>>>>>     ===========================================================
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     ;; B2: #       out( B7 B3 ) <- in( B1 )  Freq: 1
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f48211d76d6 (+0x36):   mov    0xc(%rsi),%ebp
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f48211d76d9 (+0x39):   mov    0xc(%rbp),%r11d
>     >>>>>>      ;; B3: #       out( B6 B4 ) <- in( B2 )  Freq: 0.999999
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f48211d76dd (+0x3d):   cmp    %r11d,%edx
>     >>>>>>       0x00007f48211d76e0 (+0x40):   jae    0x00007f48211d770e
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     PrintAssembly (previous plus instruction comments):
>     >>>>>>     ===========================================================
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     ;; B2: #       out( B7 B3 ) <- in( B1 )  Freq: 1
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc3e11d7a56 (+0x36):   mov    0xc(%rsi),%ebp           ;*getfield value {reexecute=0
>     >>>> rethrow=0 return_oop=0}
>     >>>>>>                                                                     ; - java.lang.String::charAt at 8
>     >>>> (line 702)
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc3e11d7a59 (+0x39):   mov    0xc(%rbp),%r11d          ; implicit exception: dispatches to
>     >>>> 0x00007fc3e11d7a9e
>     >>>>>>      ;; B3: #       out( B6 B4 ) <- in( B2 )  Freq: 0.999999
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc3e11d7a5d (+0x3d):   cmp    %r11d,%edx
>     >>>>>>       0x00007fc3e11d7a60 (+0x40):   jae    0x00007fc3e11d7a8e
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     For completeness, here are the links to
>     >>>>>>     Bug:    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213084
>     >>>>>>     Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~lucy/webrevs/8213084.00/
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     But please, as mentioned above, first focus on the output. The nitty details of the implementation
>     >>>> I would like to discuss after the output format has received some support.
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>>     Thank you so much for your time!
>     >>>>>>     Lutz
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>>> 
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>>> 
>     >>>> 
>     >>>> 
>     >> 
>     >> 
>     > 
>     > 
>     
>     
> 


More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list