RFR: 8224671: AArch64: mauve System.arraycopy test failure

[Andrew Haley]

On 5/23/19 1:45 PM, Andrew Dinn wrote:
> Oh, nice catch.
> 
> The patch looks good for head and for all backports so count it as reviewed.
> 
> Are those the only cases where we need a variant with an unsigned int
> argument?

There probably are some more cases where there is this risk, but I'd
rather change the definitions of our registers (so that none of them
is a null pointer constant) than add a ton of overloads. That's for
the future: this simple patch is good for the backports.

-- 
Andrew Haley
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671