RFR 8214239 (S): Missing x86_64.ad patterns for clearing and setting long vector bits

[Vladimir Kozlov]

It is fine. I will submit our internal testing (more tiers) and let you know results.

Vladimir

On 11/11/19 12:24 PM, B. Blaser wrote:
> I pushed it to jdk/submit and all seems to be OK:
> 
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/submit/rev/cbe81ae81095
> 
> Should we run more tests?
> 
> Bernard
> 
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 at 21:16, Vladimir Kozlov
> <vladimir.kozlov at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/11/19 12:14 PM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>>> Very good. What testing you did?
>>
>> I mean in addition to tier1.
>>
>> Vladimir
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Vladimir
>>>
>>>> On Nov 11, 2019, at 9:23 AM, B. Blaser <bsrbnd at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Please review the following fix for [1] which has been extensively
>>>> discussed in [2]:
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bsrbnd/jdk8214239/webrev.00/
>>>>
>>>> It includes:
>>>> * Vladimir's requested changes about instruction encoding and testing
>>>> along with:
>>>> * John's suggested complementary benchmark following Sandhya's note
>>>> regarding throughput.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks (hotspot:tier1 is OK on Linux/x86_64),
>>>> Bernard
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8214239
>>>> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2019-November/035699.html
>>>