[16] RFR(S): 8249603: C1: assert(has_error == false) failed: register allocation invalid

[Tobias Hartmann]

Hi Christian,

On 11.08.20 10:40, Christian Hagedorn wrote:
> I think we will always catch an overlap later in the verification method unless we somehow correct
> the mistake until then. But I don't think that this is likely or even possible. Nevertheless, I
> still wanted to verify that to some extent and added an assert(false) in the newly added
> intersection bailout test with the split children and could not trigger it in tier 1-4 (apart from
> the newly added test).

Okay, thanks for checking!

Best regards,
Tobias