RFR (T) 8250042: Clean up methodOop and method_oop names from the code
coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
coleen.phillimore at oracle.com
Fri Jul 24 22:20:23 UTC 2020
On 7/24/20 4:28 PM, serguei.spitsyn at oracle.com wrote:
> Hi Coleen,
>
> The fix looks good to me.
> I've more focused on the serviceability related update.
> Thank you for taking care about it!
Thank you for reviewing it! Most of the name changes were in jvmti.
Hope it's cleaner to work on now.
Coleen
>
> Thanks,
> Serguei
>
>
> On 7/24/20 06:10, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>>
>> I can also replace method_oop with method_ptr in the CPU ad files,
>> and this seems to build but now someone who knows the compiler area
>> needs to comment; this was supposed to be trivial... :) But it still
>> is really trivial to look at.
>>
>> I left interpreter_method_oop_reg and compiler_method_oop_reg and
>> friends in opto/matcher.cpp for someone else.
>>
>> incremental webrev at
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/2020/8250042.02.incr/webrev
>> full webrev at
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/2020/8250042.02/webrev
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Coleen
>>
>>
>> On 7/24/20 8:23 AM, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks for looking at this.
>>>
>>> On 7/24/20 1:01 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>>>> Hi Coleen,
>>>>
>>>> On 24/07/2020 2:58 am, coleen.phillimore at oracle.com wrote:
>>>>> See bug for more details. I've been running into these names a
>>>>> lot lately. Many of these names are in JVMTI.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tested with tier1 on all Oracle platforms and built on non-Oracle
>>>>> platforms.
>>>>>
>>>>> open webrev at
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~coleenp/2020/8250042.01/webrev
>>>>> bug link https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8250042
>>>>
>>>> src/hotspot/cpu/*/*.ad
>>>>
>>>> These still refer to "method oop" and method_oop in a number of
>>>> places.
>>>
>>> Yes, I only replaced method_oop in the shared code and not in the AD
>>> code. method_oop can be the name of a parameter and using "sed" to
>>> change it to "method" doesn't work. Somebody who understands this
>>> code and looks at it will have to make the rest of the changes.
>>>
>>> What I did was replace "method oop" with "method" and "methodOop"
>>> with "method" in all the sources. I replaced "method_oop" with
>>> "method" or "checked_method" in the shared sources.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> src/hotspot/share/adlc/adlparse.cpp
>>>>
>>>> + frame->_interpreter_method_oop_reg = parse_one_arg("method reg
>>>> entry");
>>>>
>>>> I guess I'm not understanding the scope of this renaming - why is
>>>> _interpreter_method_oop_reg not renamed as well? Should this (and
>>>> other uses) be parsed as method-(oop-reg) rather than
>>>> (method-oop)-reg?
>>>
>>> I don't know this code, so I'd rather not change any more of it. The
>>> comment makes sense changed, even though the variable name still
>>> refers to method_oop.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Coleen
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise all okay.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Coleen
>>>
>>
>
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list