RFR: 8256730: Code that uses Object.checkIndex() range checks doesn't optimize well [v2]
Roland Westrelin
roland at openjdk.java.net
Fri Nov 20 15:29:05 UTC 2020
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 15:17:23 GMT, Roberto Castañeda Lozano <rcastanedalo at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Roland Westrelin has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - build fix
>> - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8256730
>> - step over CastII in range checks & push CastII thru add
>
> src/hotspot/share/opto/castnode.cpp line 269:
>
>> 267: _carry_dependency, _range_check_dependency);
>> 268: cx->set_req(0, in(0));
>> 269: cx = phase->transform(cx);
>
> Hi Roland, have you tested that these calls to `transform()` do not create an explosion of recursive `Ideal()` calls in the face of long AddI chains (see https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/727).
I wondered about that but had no issue during testing. Let me see if I can change your test case to have recursive Ideal() calls.
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/1342
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list