C2 crash in PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work
Doerr, Martin
martin.doerr at sap.com
Tue Oct 27 15:28:41 UTC 2020
Hi Christian,
thanks for your reply.
Interesting. Another issue related to JDK-8249749 was recently fixed:
8251994: VM crashed running TestComplexAddrExpr.java test with -XX:UseAVX=X
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8251994
Maybe it helps for this, too.
I don’t have a fast reproducer atm.
Best regards,
Martin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn at oracle.com>
> Sent: Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2020 13:03
> To: Doerr, Martin <martin.doerr at sap.com>; 'hotspot-compiler-
> dev at openjdk.java.net' <hotspot-compiler-dev at openjdk.java.net>
> Subject: Re: C2 crash in PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work
>
> Hi Martin
>
> Yes, this is a known problem (see JDK-8251925). We also see it failing
> with only this benchmark, often in log-regression. I played around with
> different settings by just running log-regression, for example, which
> did not seem to trigger it, though. Do you have a fast reproducer?
>
> It started to fail after JDK-8249749 which, however, just seem to have
> revealed the problem.
>
> Best regards,
> Christian
>
> On 27.10.20 12:07, Doerr, Martin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we observe C2 crashes on all x86_64 platforms when running Renaissance
> Benchmark "log-regression" since 2020-08-10.
> > (hg was at "8250848: [aarch64] nativeGotJump_at() missing call to verify()."
> when we've seen it first.)
> >
> >
> > # EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) at
> pc=0x00007ffd594e9322, pid=1439804, tid=1516348
> >
> > #
> >
> > # JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (16.0.0.1) (build 16.0.0.1-
> internal+0-adhoc.openjdk.jdk-dev)
> >
> > # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (16.0.0.1-internal+0-
> adhoc.openjdk.jdk-dev, mixed mode, sharing, tiered, compressed oops, g1
> gc, windows-amd64)
> >
> > # Problematic frame:
> >
> > # V [jvm.dll+0x559322]
> PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work+0x212
> >
> >
> >
> > Host: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E7-8880 v4 @ 2.20GHz, 8 cores, 15G, Windows
> Server 2016 , 64 bit Build 14393 (10.0.14393.3630)
> >
> > Time: Sat Oct 24 19:40:57 2020 W. Europe Daylight Time elapsed time:
> 16.016253 seconds (0d 0h 0m 16s)
> >
> >
> > V [jvm.dll+0x559322] PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late_post_work+0x212
> (loopnode.cpp:5312)
> >
> > V [jvm.dll+0x5590b4] PhaseIdealLoop::build_loop_late+0x214
> (loopnode.cpp:5159)
> >
> > V [jvm.dll+0x558418] PhaseIdealLoop::build_and_optimize+0x7b8
> (loopnode.cpp:3874)
> >
> > V [jvm.dll+0x21410a] Compile::optimize_loops+0x15a (compile.cpp:1960)
> >
> > V [jvm.dll+0x20d900] Compile::Optimize+0xf90 (compile.cpp:2184)
> >
> > V [jvm.dll+0x20b105] Compile::Compile+0xba5 (compile.cpp:735)
> >
> > V [jvm.dll+0x19de6b] C2Compiler::compile_method+0xab
> (c2compiler.cpp:104)
> >
> > Is this a known problem?
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Martin
> >
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list