RFR: 8298632: [TESTBUG] Add IR checks in jtreg vectorization tests
Vladimir Kozlov
kvn at openjdk.org
Thu Dec 15 18:08:08 UTC 2022
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 09:01:42 GMT, Pengfei Li <pli at openjdk.org> wrote:
> In JDK-8183390, we introduced a new auto-vectorization testing framework in hotspot jtreg tests. The new framework provides us a much simpler way to add new test cases of auto-vectorizable loops. But the previous patch just added a check of the correctness of the result after vectorization. There is no check about whether the code is vectorized or not.
>
> This patch adds IR checks to verify C2's vectorization ability on test cases inside this framework. With this patch, each test method annotated with `@Test` is verified in two ways. First, it's invoked twice and the return results from the interpreter and C2 compiled code are compared. Second, the count of expected vector IR is checked by the IR framework if the test method has IR rule annotation.
>
> Ideally, we should check IR rules on all platforms. But in practice, the vectorization ability can be quite different on different platforms, or different generations of CPUs of one platform. So in this patch, we only add vectorizable checks for AArch64. Checks for other platforms (such as x86) can still be added later with more CPU feature conditions. We also add some negative rules (or in-vectorizable rules) with `@IR(failOn=...` on cases that should not be vectorized on any platform.
>
> A few more test cases are added within this patch as well.
>
> We tested the new IR rules on below kinds of CPUs.
> - AArch64 w/ 512-bit SVE
> - AArch64 w/ 128-bit SVE
> - AArch64 w/o SVE (NEON only)
> - x86
Good work. But I think you should add x86 IR testing too. It could be done by adding `"sse2", "true"` to `applyIfCPUFeatureOr`. Or high features (avx2, avx512) if required.
You should also consider reducing time to run these tests since you added additional testing. May be lower value of `SIZE`.
-------------
Changes requested by kvn (Reviewer).
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11687
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list