RFR: 8160404: RelocationHolder constructors have bugs [v2]

[Kim Barrett]

On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 21:34:02 GMT, John R Rose <jrose at openjdk.org> wrote:

> I suggest putting all the static asserts in one place, instead of two of them in place A and the third (trivial destructor) in place B.

The static asserts about class relationships and size are checked where they are relied upon.  The trivial destructor assumption is relied upon elsewhere (holder assignment, copy_into implementations, and ~Relocation) and not there.  There isn't really a single good place to verify assumption.  I've expanded on comments to indicate where that assumption comes into play.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11618