RFR: 8280320: C2: Loop opts are missing during OSR compilation

[Vladimir Ivanov]

After [JDK-8272330](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8272330), OSR compilations may completely miss loop optimizations pass due to misleading profiling data. The cleanup changed how profile counts are scaled and it had surprising effect on OSR compilations. 

For a long-running loop it's common to have an MDO allocated during the first invocation while running in the loop. Also, OSR compilation may be scheduled while running the very first method invocation. In such case, `MethodData::invocation_counter() == 0` while `MethodData::backedge_counter() > 0`. Before JDK-8272330 went in, `ciMethod::scale_count()` took into account both `invocation_counter()` and `backedge_counter()`. Now `MethodData::invocation_counter()` is taken by `ciMethod::scale_count()` as is and it forces all counts to be unconditionally scaled to `1`. 

It misleads `IdealLoopTree::beautify_loops()` to believe there are no hot
backedges in the loop being compiled and `IdealLoopTree::split_outer_loop()`
doesn't kick in thus effectively blocking any further loop optimizations.

Proposed fix bumps `MethodData::invocation_counter()` from `0` to `1` and
enables `ciMethod::scale_count()` to report sane numbers.

Testing: 
- hs-tier1 - hs-tier4

-------------

Commit messages:
 - 8280320: C2: Loop opts are missing during OSR compilation

Changes: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19/pull/38/files
 Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk19&pr=38&range=00
  Issue: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8280320
  Stats: 4 lines in 1 file changed: 3 ins; 0 del; 1 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19/pull/38.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19 pull/38/head:pull/38

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk19/pull/38