RFR: 8301313: RISC-V: C2: assert(false) failed: bad AD file due to missing match rule

Thu Feb 2 02:28:21 UTC 2023

On Thu, 2 Feb 2023 02:02:07 GMT, Yadong Wang <yadongwang at openjdk.org> wrote:

> LGTM. But with ConditionalMoveLimit of 0, can we guarantee all the CMoves covered by these match rules?

Yes, this pr added `CMoveL_CmpI` and `CMoveL_CmpU`, combined with existing CMove instructs, we should be able to cover all other CMove scenarios not guarded by ConditionalMoveLimit.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/12295