RFR: 8295486: Inconsistent constant field values observed during compilation [v10]

Vladimir Kozlov kvn at openjdk.org
Tue Jan 31 16:24:36 UTC 2023


On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 06:11:03 GMT, Tobias Hartmann <thartmann at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> We hit a "not monotonic" assert because the new type of a load from a stable final field is more narrow than the old type which contradicts the assumption that types should only go from TOP to BOTTOM during CCP:
>> 
>> old: `narrowoop: java/lang/Integer:BotPTR:exact *`
>> new: `narrowoop: java/lang/Integer java.lang.Integer {0x000000062c41e548} ...`
>> 
>> or 
>> 
>> old: `narrowoop: java/lang/Integer java.lang.Integer {0x000000062c41e538} ...`
>> new: `narrowoop: java/lang/Integer java.lang.Integer {0x000000062c41e548} ...`
>> 
>> The problem is that a stable field can be (re-)initialized during compilation and since the value is not cached, contradicting types can be observed. In `LoadNode::Value`, we re-read the field value each time: 
>> 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/872384707e89d03ede655aad16f360dc94f10152/src/hotspot/share/opto/memnode.cpp#L1994-L1997
>> 
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/872384707e89d03ede655aad16f360dc94f10152/src/hotspot/share/opto/type.cpp#L332-L337
>> 
>> The same problem exists for loads from stable arrays:
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/872384707e89d03ede655aad16f360dc94f10152/src/hotspot/share/opto/memnode.cpp#L1923
>> 
>> Caching the field value is not feasible as it would require a cache per ciInstance for all the fields and per ciArray for all the elements. Alternatively, we could keep track of the lookup and only do it once but that would also be lots of additional complexity for a benign issue.
>> 
>> Instead, I propose to skip verification during CCP when folding loads from stable fields. Non-stable, constant fields are not affected as `null` is a valid value for them and they would already be folded before CCP.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tobias
>
> Tobias Hartmann has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 13 commits:
> 
>  - Merged with master
>  - Forgot to change order in constructor
>  - Fixed typo
>  - Switched order of fields
>  - Assert to catch duplicates and GrowableArray init
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8295486
>  - Check cache before state transition
>  - Fix to verification code
>  - NULL -> nullptr
>  - Moved caching logic to ciObject
>  - ... and 3 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/64b25ea0...c46e85f8

Good. Thank you for answering all my questions.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by kvn (Reviewer).

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/11861


More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list