RFR: JDK-8309266: C2: assert(final_con == (jlong)final_int) failed: final value should be integer [v4]
Christian Hagedorn
chagedorn at openjdk.org
Mon Jun 19 12:59:09 UTC 2023
On Mon, 19 Jun 2023 12:50:00 GMT, Eric Nothum <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> **Acknowledgments**: Thanks to @quadhier for the preliminary work on this issue: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/14353
>>
>> **JDK-8309266**: TestLoopLimitOverflowDuringCCP.java causes an assertion error (overflow check) in LoopLimitNode::Value. To fix the issue I added a check in LoopLimitNode::Value that verifies that the input nodes are ConI type nodes.
>>
>> Previously, TestLoopLimitOverflowDuringCCP would cause the assertion error in LoopLimitNode::Value, during PhaseCCP::analyze. The problem originated from PhaseCCP initializing all types to TOP, resulting in the Phi node from `int limit = flag ? 1000 : Integer.MAX_VALUE` being temporarily considered as Integer.MAX_VALUE. This happens as the Node for the Integer.MAX_VALUE case was already analyzed by CCP while the Node for the 1000 case was still initialized to TOP. When resolving the value of the Phi node, Integer.MAX_VALUE and TOP get merged to Integer.MAX_VALUE, which is then processed by LoopLimitNode::Value as a constant, resulting in the integer overflow.
>>
>> By checking that the input nodes are ConI nodes in LoopLimitNode::Value, we avoid Phi nodes being misinterpreted during PhaseCCP. If the Phi nodes turn out to be constant they should rather be first transformed to ConI nodes.
>
> Eric Nothum has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> JDK-8309266: cosmetic change in assert
Looks good!
-------------
Marked as reviewed by chagedorn (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/14490#pullrequestreview-1486175138
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list