RFR: 8305770: os::Linux::available_memory() should refer MemAvailable in /proc/meminfo [v4]
Roberto Castañeda Lozano
rcastanedalo at openjdk.org
Mon May 8 13:59:53 UTC 2023
On Mon, 8 May 2023 13:54:53 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga <ysuenaga at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> `os::Linux::available_memory()` returns available memory from cgroups or sysinfo(2). In case of the process which run on out of container, that value is based on `freeram` from sysinfo(2).
>>
>> `freeram` is equivalent to `MemFree` in `/proc/meminfo` [1]. However it means just a free RAM. We should use `MemAvailable` when we want to know how much memory is available for the process [2]. `MemAvailable` is available in modern Linux kernel, and it has been backported some older kernels (e.g. RHEL). In `sar` from sysstat, it refers that value and shows it as `kbavail` [3].
>>
>> AFAIK PhysicalMemory event in JFR depends on `os::Linux::available_memory()`, and it is used in automated analysis in JMC. So the JFR/JMC user could misunderstand physical memory was exhausted even if the memory was available enough.
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/c9c3395d5e3dcc6daee66c6908354d47bf98cb0c/fs/proc/meminfo.c#L59
>> [2] https://docs.kernel.org/filesystems/proc.html?highlight=memavailable
>> [3] https://github.com/sysstat/sysstat/blob/ac1df71ca252c158e8d418ded93e5ed52f5e8765/rd_stats.c#L325-L328
>
> Yasumasa Suenaga has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains six additional commits since the last revision:
>
> - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into JDK-8305770
> - Use nullptr in condition
> - Fix comments
> - Introduce os::free_memory
> - Use JULONG_FORMAT in format string
> - 8305770: os::Linux::available_memory() should refer MemAvailable in /proc/meminfo
Compiler changes look good, thanks!
-------------
Marked as reviewed by rcastanedalo (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13398#pullrequestreview-1416855041
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list