RFR: 8302673: [SuperWord] MaxReduction and MinReduction should vectorize for int
Roberto Castañeda Lozano
rcastanedalo at openjdk.org
Wed May 31 07:26:57 UTC 2023
On Wed, 17 May 2023 14:30:39 GMT, Emanuel Peter <epeter at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The canonicalization of MinI/MaxI chains into right-spline graphs within `MinINode/MaxINode::Ideal()` inhibits the vectorization of reductions of these nodes. This changeset reworks `MinINode/MaxINode::Ideal()` to perform the same algebraic optimizations without the need for canonicalization, re-enabling auto-vectorization of MinI/MaxI reductions. This is achieved by handling all four permutations of the targeted Ideal subgraph induced by the commutativity of MinI/MaxI directly. The algorithm (for the MaxI case, the MinI case is analogous) tries to apply two Ideal graph rewrites in the following order, where `c0` and `c1` are constants and `MAX` is a compile-time operation:
>> 1. `max(x + c0, max(x + c1, z))` (or a permutation of it) to `max(x + MAX(c0, c1), z)`.
>> 2. `max(x + c0, x + c1)` (or a permutation of it) to `x + MAX(c0, c1)`.
>>
>> Here is an example of the four permutations handled in step 1 with `x = RShiftI`, `c0 = 100` or `150`, `c1 = 150` or `100`, and `z = ConI (#int:200)`:
>>
>> 
>>
>> Here is an example of the two permutations handled in step 2 with `x = RShiftI`, `c0 = 10` or `11`, and `c1 = 11` or `10`:
>>
>> 
>>
>> The changeset implements `MinINode/MaxINode::Ideal()` in a common method `MaxNode::IdealI()`, since the algorithm is symmetric for both node types. The changeset also extends the existing MinI/MaxI Idealization tests with positive tests for all targeted permutations and negative tests, and adds a new test (contributed by @jbhateja) to assert that MinI/MaxI reductions are vectorized.
>>
>> #### Testing
>>
>> ##### Functionality
>>
>> - tier1-5, stress test, fuzzing (windows-x64, linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macosx-x64, macosx-aarch64; release and debug mode).
>>
>> ##### Performance
>>
>> - Tested performance on a set of standard benchmark suites (DaCapo, SPECjbb2015, SPECjvm2008). No significant change was observed.
>
> Nice work with the tests, it's good to have some specific IR tests there!
>
> I hope we can also generalize this for `MaxL/MinL` (once we do this [JDK-8307513](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307513)) - I think that is now also going to be easier with your refactoring towards `MaxNode::IdealI`.
@eme64 Sorry for the delay, I have addressed your feedback now! Please let me know if you find the new version more readable.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/13924#issuecomment-1569638291
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list