RFR: 8328480: C2: SubTypeCheckNode in checkcast should use the klass constant of a unique concrete sub class [v3]

[Christian Hagedorn]

On Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:05:15 GMT, Christian Hagedorn <chagedorn at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> While working on a [Valhalla bug](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8321734), I've noticed that a `SubTypeCheckNode` for a `checkcast` does not take a unique concrete sub class `X` of an abstract class `A` as klass constant in the sub type check. Instead, it uses the abstract klass constant:
>> 
>> 
>> abstract class A {}
>> class X extends A {}
>> 
>> A x = (A)object; // Emits SubTypeCheckNode(object, A), but could have used X instead of A.
>> 
>> However, the `CheckCastPP` result already uses the improved instance type ptr `X` (i.e. `toop` which was improved from `A` by calling `try_improve()` to get the unique concrete sub class):
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/614db2ea9e10346475eef34629eab54878aa482d/src/hotspot/share/opto/graphKit.cpp#L3257-L3261
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/614db2ea9e10346475eef34629eab54878aa482d/src/hotspot/share/opto/graphKit.cpp#L3363
>> 
>> We should also plug in a unique concrete sub class constant in the `SubTypeCheckNode` which could be beneficial to fold away redundant sub type checks (see test cases).
>> 
>> This fix is required to completely fix the bug in Valhalla (this is only one of the broken cases). In Valhalla, the graph ends up being broken because a `CheckCastPP` node is folded because of an impossible type but the `SubTypeCheckNode` is not due to not using the improved unique concrete sub class constant for the `checkcast`. I don't think that there is currently a bug in mainline because of this limitation - it just blocks some optimizations. I'm therefore upstreaming this fix to mainline since it can be beneficial to have this fix here as well (see test cases).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Christian
>
> Christian Hagedorn has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Revert "using improved type for non-constants" + add comment

Thanks Roland for your review and the discussion!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18515#issuecomment-2051473937