RFR: 8302850: Implement C1 clone intrinsic that reuses arraycopy code for primitive arrays [v8]

[Leonid Mesnik]

On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 15:49:18 GMT, Galder Zamarreño <galder at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Adding C1 intrinsic for primitive array clone invocations for aarch64 and x86 architectures.
>> 
>> The intrinsic includes a change to avoid zeroing the newly allocated array because its contents are copied over within the same intrinsic with arraycopy. This means that the performance of primitive array clone exceeds that of primitive array copy. As an example, here are the microbenchmark results on darwin/aarch64:
>> 
>> 
>> $ make test TEST="micro:java.lang.ArrayClone" MICRO="JAVA_OPTIONS=-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1"
>> Benchmark                 (size)  Mode  Cnt    Score    Error  Units
>> ArrayClone.byteArraycopy       0  avgt   15    3.476 ?  0.018  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.byteArraycopy      10  avgt   15    3.740 ?  0.017  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.byteArraycopy     100  avgt   15    7.124 ?  0.010  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.byteArraycopy    1000  avgt   15   39.301 ?  0.106  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.byteClone           0  avgt   15    3.478 ?  0.008  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.byteClone          10  avgt   15    3.562 ?  0.007  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.byteClone         100  avgt   15    5.888 ?  0.206  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.byteClone        1000  avgt   15   25.762 ?  0.203  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.intArraycopy        0  avgt   15    3.199 ?  0.016  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.intArraycopy       10  avgt   15    4.521 ?  0.008  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.intArraycopy      100  avgt   15   17.429 ?  0.039  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.intArraycopy     1000  avgt   15  178.432 ?  0.777  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.intClone            0  avgt   15    3.406 ?  0.016  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.intClone           10  avgt   15    4.272 ?  0.006  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.intClone          100  avgt   15   13.110 ?  0.122  ns/op
>> ArrayClone.intClone         1000  avgt   15  113.196 ? 13.400  ns/op
>> 
>> 
>> It also includes an optimization to avoid instantiating the array copy stub in scenarios like this.
>> 
>> I run hotspot compiler tests successfully limiting them to C1 compilation darwin/aarch64, linux/x86_64 and linux/686. E.g.
>> 
>> 
>> $ make test TEST="hotspot_compiler" JTREG="JAVA_OPTIONS=-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1"
>> ...
>>    TEST                                              TOTAL  PASS  FAIL ERROR
>>    jtreg:test/hotspot/jtreg:hotspot_compiler          1234  1234     0     0
>> 
>> 
>> One question I had is what to do about non-primitive object arrays, see my [question](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8302850?focusedId=14634879&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-14634879) on the issue. @cl4es any thoughts?
>> 
>>...
>
> Galder Zamarreño has updated the pull request incrementally with four additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Peek receiver without pop/push
>  - require receiver_klass to be loaded for now
>  - missing check for unloaded
>  - suggested cleanup

Changes requested by lmesnik (Reviewer).

test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c1/TestNullArrayClone.java line 39:

> 37: public class TestNullArrayClone {
> 38:     public static void main(String[] args)
> 39:     {

please change style to use
public static void main(String[] args) { 
instead of
public static void main(String[] args)
{
in the test code.

test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c1/TestNullArrayClone.java line 56:

> 54:             test(null);
> 55:             System.out.println("Expected NullPointerException to be thrown");
> 56:             System.exit(97);

Please throw RuntimeException instead of System.exit().

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17667#pullrequestreview-2002311597
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17667#discussion_r1566523477
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17667#discussion_r1566522981