RFR: 8300148: Consider using a StoreStore barrier instead of Release barrier on ctor exit [v11]

[Fei Yang]

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 17:06:39 GMT, Joshua Cao <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> The [JSR 133 cookbook](https://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/jmm/cookbook.html) has long recommended using a `StoreStore` barrier at the end of constructors that write to final fields. `StoreStore` barriers are much cheaper on arm machines as shown in benchmarks in this issue as well as https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8324186.
>> 
>> This change does not improve the case for constructors for objects with volatile fields because [MemBarRelease is emitted for volatile stores](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8fc9097b3720314ef7efaf1f3ac31898c8d6ca19/src/hotspot/share/gc/shared/c2/barrierSetC2.cpp#L211). This is demonstrated in test case `classWithVolatile`, where this patch does not impact the IR.
>> 
>> I had to modify some code around escape analysis to make sure there are no regressions in eliminating allocations and `StoreStore`'s. The [current handling of StoreStore's in escape analysis](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8fc9097b3720314ef7efaf1f3ac31898c8d6ca19/src/hotspot/share/opto/escape.cpp#L2590) makes the assumption that the barriers input is a `Proj` to an `Allocate` ([example](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8fc9097b3720314ef7efaf1f3ac31898c8d6ca19/src/hotspot/share/opto/library_call.cpp#L1553)). This is contrary to the barriers in the end of the constructor where there the barrier directly takes in an `Allocate` without an in between `Proj`. I opted to instead eliminate `StoreStore`s in GVN, exactly how `MemBarRelease` is handled.
>> 
>> I had to add [checks for StoreStore in macro.cpp](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8fc9097b3720314ef7efaf1f3ac31898c8d6ca19/src/hotspot/share/opto/macro.cpp#L636), or else we fail some [cases for reducing allocation merges](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/8fc9097b3720314ef7efaf1f3ac31898c8d6ca19/test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c2/irTests/scalarReplacement/AllocationMergesTests.java#L1233-L1256).
>> 
>> Passes hotspot tier1 locally on a Linux machine.
>> 
>> ### Benchmarks
>> 
>> Running Renaissance ParNnemonics on an Amazon Graviton (arm) instance.
>> 
>> Baseline:
>> 
>> Result "org.renaissance.jdk.streams.JmhParMnemonics.run":
>>   N = 25
>>   mean =   3309.611 ±(99.9%) 86.699 ms/op
>> 
>>   Histogram, ms/op:
>>     [3000.000, 3050.000) = 0
>>     [3050.000, 3100.000) = 4
>>     [3100.000, 3150.000) = 1
>>     [3150.000, 3200.000) = 0
>>     [3200.000, 3250.000) = 0
>>     [3250.000, 3300.000) = 0
>>     [3300.000, 3350.000) = 9
>>     [3350.000, 3400.000) = 6
>>     [3400.000, 3450.000) = 5
>> 
>>   Percentiles, ms/op:
>>       p(0...
>
> Joshua Cao has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 20 commits:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into storestore
>  - Merge branch 'master' into storestore
>  - Apply suggestions from code review
>    
>    some formatting suggestions from @shipilev
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Aleksey Shipilëv <shipilev at amazon.de>
>  - Guard everything by feature flag
>  - Revert "Statistics for barriers generated/eliminated"
>    
>    This reverts commit 33d23635048afd3a1b40ae91e6fadf577742fa4f.
>  - Make flag product diagnostic and guard string concat storestore by flag
>  - Statistics for barriers generated/eliminated
>  - global flag to turn on storestore barrier emission and membar acquires
>    IR tests
>  - Add micro benchmark courtesy of @shipilev
>  - More comprehensive IR tests based on @shipilev's suggestions
>  - ... and 10 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/235ba9a7...104d733d

test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/c2/irTests/ConstructorBarriers.java line 33:

> 31:  * @summary Test barriers emitted in constructors
> 32:  * @library /test/lib /
> 33:  * @requires os.arch=="aarch64" | os.arch=="x86_64" | os.arch=="amd64"

Hi, Could you please enable this test for riscv64 as well? It passes on linux-riscv64 (fastdebug build).
`@requires os.arch=="aarch64" | os.arch=="riscv64" | os.arch=="x86_64" | os.arch=="amd64"`

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18505#discussion_r1572132454