RFR: 8329797: Shenandoah: Default case invoked for: "MaxL" (bad AD file)
Joshua Cao
duke at openjdk.org
Fri Apr 19 16:32:56 UTC 2024
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 08:37:05 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> The bug occurs when [Shenandoah optimizations resets post_loop_opts](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/040c93565c0dff6270911eb9e58d78aa01bbb925/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/c2/shenandoahSupport.cpp#L52), and we may [create a MaxL after macro expansion](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/040c93565c0dff6270911eb9e58d78aa01bbb925/src/hotspot/share/opto/movenode.cpp#L198). `MaxL` does not have a matcher rule, and we run into an assertion failure.
>>
>> This PR guards the `MaxL` creation with a new `began_macro_expansion()` flag. I think there are many other instances in code that should use the new flag instead of `post_loop_opts()`, which can be explored in [JDK-8330531](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330531).
>>
>> The bug was originally found in [h2 Index::getCostRangeIndex()](https://github.com/h2database/h2database/blob/master/h2/src/main/org/h2/index/Index.java#L579) through Dacapo. Its easy to reproduce by creating a loop that includes a `ShenandoahLoadReferenceBarrier` (load any object) and a `MaxL`.
>>
>> Caveat: I created test cases for both `MaxL` and `MinL` for completeness. The `MinL` test case does not actually fail before this PR. Somehow the `CMove` condition is converted to non-canonical `>`, which is [not accepted by the Idealization](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/040c93565c0dff6270911eb9e58d78aa01bbb925/src/hotspot/share/opto/movenode.cpp#L219). The `MinL` is never created and there is no crash.
>>
>> Passing hotspot tier1 locally on Linux machine.
>
> src/hotspot/share/opto/compile.hpp line 321:
>
>> 319:
>> 320: bool _post_loop_opts_phase; // Loop opts are finished.
>> 321: bool _began_macro_expansion; // Macro expansion is started.
>
> I think this sounds better as inverse, `bool _allow_macro_nodes; // Allow creating macro nodes`. Then we can also assert `_allow_macro_nodes` in `add_macro_node`?
Can't add the assert for free. Apparently macro nodes are added later in the compiler pipeline, Matcher in this case.
Stack: [0x00007fb2c6d50000,0x00007fb2c6e51000], sp=0x00007fb2c6e4caa0, free space=1010k
Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code)
V [libjvm.so+0x63bd9d] Compile::add_macro_node(Node*)+0x49 (compile.hpp:742)
V [libjvm.so+0x124ccc5] Node::clone() const+0x15f (node.cpp:501)
V [libjvm.so+0x119a93a] Matcher::xform(Node*, int)+0x3a2 (matcher.cpp:1150)
V [libjvm.so+0x1195413] Matcher::match()+0xe8b (matcher.cpp:359)
V [libjvm.so+0x9a9723] Compile::Code_Gen()+0x95 (compile.cpp:2947)
V [libjvm.so+0x99fd8d] Compile::Compile(ciEnv*, ciMethod*, int, Options, DirectiveSet*)+0x1827 (compile.cpp:895)
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18824#discussion_r1572635814
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list