RFR: 8343789: Move mutable nmethod data out of CodeCache [v3]

[Dean Long]

On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 18:18:56 GMT, Boris Ulasevich <bulasevich at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This change relocates mutable data (such as relocations, oops, and metadata) from the nmethod. The change follows the recent PR #18984, which relocated immutable nmethod data from the CodeCache.
>> 
>> The core idea remains the same: use the CodeCache for executable code while moving additional data to the C heap. The primary motivations are improving security and enhancing code density.
>> 
>> Although performance is not the main focus, testing on AArch64 CPUs, where code density plays a significant role, has shown a 1–2% performance improvement in specific scenarios, such as the CodeCacheStress test and the Renaissance Dotty benchmark.
>> 
>> The numbers. Immutable data constitutes **~30%** on the nmehtod. Mutable data constitutes **~8%** of nmethod. Example (statistics collected on the CodeCacheStress benchmark):
>> - nmethod_count:134000, total_compilation_time: 510460ms
>> - total allocation time malloc_mutable/malloc_immutable/CodeCache_alloc: 62ms/114ms/6333ms,
>> - total allocation size (mutable/immutable/nmentod): 64MB/192MB/488MB
>> 
>> Functional testing: jtreg on arm/aarch/x86.
>> Performance testing: renaissance/dacapo/SPECjvm2008 benchmarks.
>> 
>> Alternative solution (see comments): In the future, relocations can be moved to _immutable_data.
>
> Boris Ulasevich has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   a bit of cleanup and satisfying review suggestions

src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/macroAssembler_aarch64.hpp line 1419:

> 1417: 
> 1418:   void ldr_patchable(Register dest, const Address &const_addr) {
> 1419:     if (CodeCache::contains(const_addr.target())) {

Doesn't this cause us to generate LDR for oops outside the code cache, when what we need is the ADRP below?  The caller is still using a PC-relative dummy address.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21276#discussion_r1876893689