RFR: 8345609: [C1] LIR Operations with one input should be implemented as LIR_Op1 [v2]

[Martin Doerr]

On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 21:29:51 GMT, Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Change `lir_sqrt`, `lir_abs`, `lir_neg`, `lir_f2hf`, `lir_hf2f` to use `LIR_Op1`. Extend `LIR_Op1` to support one temp register operand. Also see JBS issue.
>> 
>> Remove `lir_tan` and `lir_log10` which are unused (dead and incomplete code). They should have been removed with or after https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/ad79a5ae65d24861ead3ae96cf148c8bc0f02736 and the corresponding changes on other platforms.
>> 
>> The removal of the unnecessary float constant loads improves performance:
>> make run-test TEST="micro:Fp16ConversionBenchmark" MICRO="VM_OPTIONS=-XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1"
>> 
>> Power 10 without patch:
>> 
>> Benchmark                                     (size)   Mode  Cnt      Score    Error   Units
>> Fp16ConversionBenchmark.floatToFloat16          2048  thrpt   15    247.064 ±  0.189  ops/ms
>> 
>> 
>> Power 10 with patch:
>> 
>> Benchmark                                     (size)   Mode  Cnt      Score    Error   Units
>> Fp16ConversionBenchmark.floatToFloat16          2048  thrpt   15    308.372 ±  0.432  ops/ms
>> 
>> 
>> x64 machine without patch:
>> 
>> Benchmark                                     (size)   Mode  Cnt      Score    Error   Units
>> Fp16ConversionBenchmark.floatToFloat16          2048  thrpt   15     384.565 ±    3.758  ops/ms
>> 
>> 
>> x64 machine with patch:
>> 
>> Benchmark                                     (size)   Mode  Cnt      Score    Error   Units
>> Fp16ConversionBenchmark.floatToFloat16          2048  thrpt   15     406.121 ±    3.228  ops/ms
>> 
>> 
>> Testing: tier1-4 on x64 (Windows, linux, MacOS), aarch64 (linux, MacOS), ppc64 (linux, AIX)
>
> Martin Doerr has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Update Copyright headers.

Thanks for the review!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/22582#issuecomment-2535903697