RFR: 8324969: assert(false) failed: Non-balanced monitor enter/exit! [v5]

[Emanuel Peter]

On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:45:42 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev <shade at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Vladimir Kozlov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>> 
>>   Additional changes
>
> Drive-by suggestion: Can we name the bug mention what is being done, rather than a symptom? Thanks!

@shipilev people have different philosophies about that, it seems. Is there a "style guiede" for that?
I prefer "what is being done" too. Makes it easier when browsing through the "git blame" later.

Suggestion: `C2: prevent elimination of unballanced coarsened lock boxes`

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17697#issuecomment-1943453173