RFR: 8324969: assert(false) failed: Non-balanced monitor enter/exit! [v5]

[Vladimir Kozlov]

On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:15:02 GMT, Emanuel Peter <epeter at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Drive-by suggestion: Can we name the bug mention what is being done, rather than a symptom? Thanks!
>
> @shipilev people have different philosophies about that, it seems. Is there a "style guiede" for that?
> I prefer "what is being done" too. Makes it easier when browsing through the "git blame" later.
> 
> Suggestion: `C2: prevent elimination of unballanced coarsened lock boxes`

Thank you, @eme64  and @iwanowww for reviews.
@dean-long, did I answered your questions and do you have other comments?

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17697#issuecomment-1944454281