RFR: 8323220: Reassociate loop invariants involved in Cmps and Add/Subs [v4]

Xin Liu xliu at openjdk.org
Wed Jan 24 03:24:27 UTC 2024


On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:58:42 GMT, Joshua Cao <duke at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> // inv1 == (x + inv2) => ( inv1 - inv2 ) == x
>> // inv1 == (x - inv2) => ( inv1 + inv2 ) == x
>> // inv1 == (inv2 - x) => (-inv1 + inv2 ) == x
>> 
>> 
>> For example,
>> 
>> 
>> fn(inv1, inv2)
>>   while(...)
>>       x = foobar()
>>       if inv1 == x + inv2
>>            blackhole()
>> 
>> 
>> We can transform this into
>> 
>> 
>> fn(inv1, inv2)
>>   t = inv1 - inv2
>>   while(...)
>>       x = foobar()
>>       if t == x
>>            blackhole()
>> 
>> 
>> Here is an example: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/b78896b9aafcb15f453eaed6e154a5461581407b/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/invoke/LambdaFormEditor.java#L910. LHS `1` and RHS `pos` are both loop invariant
>> 
>> Passes tier1 locally on Linux machine. Passes GHA on my fork.
>
> Joshua Cao has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Formatting and fix typo

LTGM. I am not a reviewer. 
just one suggestion. Should we also update the comments of 'reassociate' ?  this line:
> For add/sub expressions: see "reassociate_add_sub"

-------------

Marked as reviewed by xliu (Committer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/17375#pullrequestreview-1840319203


More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list