Integrated: 8333644: C2: assert(is_Bool()) failed: invalid node class: Phi
Christian Hagedorn
chagedorn at openjdk.org
Thu Jun 6 07:00:49 UTC 2024
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:33:27 GMT, Christian Hagedorn <chagedorn at openjdk.org> wrote:
> In the patch of [JDK-8330386](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330386), I've added a test case that took the code path in `clone_loop_handle_data_uses()` with the new `OpaqueInitializedAssertionPredicateNode`. So, it proved that we should also add a case for `OpaqueInitializedAssertionPredicate` - yet somehow, I forgot to do that. Unfortunately, I could not come up with a failing test if we do not handle this case separately and the mistake went unnoticed.
>
> But the fuzzer has now found such a case where we crash when creating the Mach graph because we have an `If` with a `Phi` input instead of a `Bool`. This happens exactly because of not handling `OpaqueInitializedAssertionPredicate` in `clone_loop_handle_data_uses()`.
>
> We have an outside use of a `4843 Bool` (`4193 RangeCheck`) which is also an input into a `OpaqueInitializedAssertionPredicate` node:
>
> 
>
> We should now clone this `Bool/Cmp` down to avoid having a `Phi` between the `OpaqueInitializedAssertionPredicate` and
> the `Bool` node which currently wrongly happens:
>
> 
>
> and we crash later. With this simple patch, this is being avoided.
>
> The good thing is that we now have a test that makes sure that this new condition is properly tested.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: 7ef28312
Author: Christian Hagedorn <chagedorn at openjdk.org>
URL: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/commit/7ef283129388413b362942fb45af48d1f7393b67
Stats: 52 lines in 2 files changed: 44 ins; 1 del; 7 mod
8333644: C2: assert(is_Bool()) failed: invalid node class: Phi
Reviewed-by: thartmann, kvn
-------------
PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/19561
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list