RFR: 8325520: Vector loads with offsets incorrectly compiled [v12]
Emanuel Peter
epeter at openjdk.org
Tue May 21 14:00:05 UTC 2024
On Tue, 21 May 2024 13:47:32 GMT, Damon Fenacci <dfenacci at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> # Issue
>> When loading multiple vectors using offsets or masks (e.g. `LongVector::fromArray(LongVector.SPECIES_256, storage, 0, offsets, 0` or `LongVector::fromArray(LongVector.SPECIES_256, storage, 0, longMask)`) there is an error in the C2 compiled code that makes different vectors be treated as equal even though they are not.
>>
>> # Causes
>> On vector-capable platforms, vector loads with masks and offsets (for Long, Integer, Float and Double) create specific nodes in the ideal graph (i.e. `LoadVectorGather`, `LoadVectorMasked`, `LoadVectorGatherMasked`). Vector loads without mask or offsets are mapped as `LoadVector` nodes instead.
>> The same is true for `StoreVector`s.
>> When running GVN loops we can get to the situation where we check if a Load node is preceded by a Store of the same address to be able to replace the Load with the input of the Store (in `LoadNode::Identity`). Here we call
>>
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/87e864bf21d71daae4e001ec4edbb4ef1f60c36d/src/hotspot/share/opto/memnode.cpp#L1258
>>
>> where we do an extra check for types if we deal with vectors but we don’t make sure that neither masks nor offsets interfere.
>> Similarly, in `StoreNode::Identity` we first check if there is a Load and then a Store:
>>
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/87e864bf21d71daae4e001ec4edbb4ef1f60c36d/src/hotspot/share/opto/memnode.cpp#L3509-L3515
>>
>> but we don’t make sure that there are no masks or offsets.
>> A few lines below, we check if there are 2 stores for the same value in a row. We need to check for masks and offsets here too but in this case we can include these cases if the masks and offsets of the vector stores are equivalent.
>>
>> # Solution
>> To avoid folding `Load`- and `StoreVector`s with masks and offsets we add a specific `store_Opcode` method to `LoadVectorGatherNode`, `LoadVectorMaskedNode` and `LoadVectorGatherMaskedNode` that doesn’t return a store opcode but instead returns its own (to avoid ever being the same as a store node). In this way, the checks in `MemNode::can_see_stored_value`
>>
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/87e864bf21d71daae4e001ec4edbb4ef1f60c36d/src/hotspot/share/opto/memnode.cpp#L1164-L1166
>>
>> and `StoreNode::Identity`
>>
>> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/87e864bf21d71daae4e001ec4edbb4ef1f60c36d/src/hotspot/share/opto/memnode.cpp#L3509-L3515
>>
>> will fail if masks or offsets are used.
>> For 2 stores of the same value we instead check for mask and offset equality.
>>
>> Regression tests for...
>
> Damon Fenacci has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> JDK-8325520: add override keyword
Looks good now! Thanks for all the updates, I think now the fix looks really concise 😊
> we add a specific store_Opcode method to LoadVectorGatherNode, LoadVectorMaskedNode and LoadVectorGatherMaskedNode that doesn’t return a store opcode but instead returns its own (to avoid ever being the same as a store node).
This part in the PR description could be updated: now we return `-1` for those that we think are not "comparable".
-------------
Marked as reviewed by epeter (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/18347#pullrequestreview-2068727496
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list