RFR: 8343506: [s390x] multiple test failures with ubsan
Amit Kumar
amitkumar at openjdk.org
Mon Nov 4 13:44:32 UTC 2024
On Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:32:30 GMT, Martin Doerr <mdoerr at openjdk.org> wrote:
> I think the is_uimm* checks should take an `uint64_t`. See assembler_riscv.inline.hpp.
But aren't `julong` same as `uint64_t` ?
I saw this in `globalDefinitions.hpp`
// Additional Java basic types
typedef uint8_t jubyte;
typedef uint16_t jushort;
typedef uint32_t juint;
typedef uint64_t julong;
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21864#issuecomment-2454749491
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list