RFR: 8348556: Inlining fails earlier for MemorySegment::reinterpret [v6]

[Per Minborg]

> This PR proposes to add some `@ForceInline` annotations in the `Module` class in order to assist inlining of FFM var/method handles.
> 
> There are also some changes in other classes (notably `j.l.Object`) which, if implemented, can take us four additional levels of inlining. However, there is a tradeoff with adding `@ForceInline` and just trying to get as deep as possible for a specific use case is probably not the best idea. 
> 
> So, we should discuss which of the proposed changes (if any), we'd like to integrate.
> 
> Tested and passed tier1-3

Per Minborg has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains nine additional commits since the last revision:

 - Revert copyright year
 - Revert changes to Object
 - Merge branch 'master' into module-force-inline
 - Add more @ForceInline and a benchmark
 - Remove reformatting
 - Remove file
 - Revert change
 - Rename method and variable
 - Add @ForceInline annotations and restructure some methods

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23460/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23460/files/7a2f7f89..401d9d4f

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23460&range=05
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23460&range=04-05

  Stats: 212749 lines in 4960 files changed: 98853 ins; 86637 del; 27259 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23460.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23460/head:pull/23460

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23460