RFR: 8362394: C2: Repeated stacked string concatenation fails with "Hit MemLimit" and other resourcing errors [v3]

[Roberto Castañeda Lozano]

On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 11:57:38 GMT, Daniel Skantz <dskantz at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This PR addresses a bug in the stringopts phase. During string concatenation, repeated stacking of concatenations can lead to excessive compilation resource use and generation of questionable code as the merging of two StringBuilder-append-toString links sc1 and sc2 can result in a new StringBuilder with the size sc1->num_arguments() * sc2->num_arguments().
>> 
>> In the attached test, the size of the successively merged StringBuilder doubles on each merge -- there's 24 of them -- as the toString result of the first component is used twice in the second component [1], etc. Not only does the compiler hang on this test case, but the string concat optimization seems to give an arbitrary amount of back-to-back stores in the generated code depending on the number of stacked concatenations.
>> 
>> The proposed solution is to put an upper bound on the size of a merged concatenation, which guards against this case of repeated concatenations on the same string variable, and potentially other edge cases. 100 seems like a generous limit, and higher limits could be insufficient as each argument corresponds to about 20 new nodes later in replace_string_concat [2].
>> 
>> [1] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/0ceb366dc26e2e4f6252da9dd8930b016a5d46ba/src/hotspot/share/opto/stringopts.cpp#L303
>> 
>> [2] https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/0ceb366dc26e2e4f6252da9dd8930b016a5d46ba/src/hotspot/share/opto/stringopts.cpp#L1806
>> 
>> Testing: T1-4.
>> 
>> Extra testing: verified that no method in T1-4 is being compiled with a merged concat candidate exceeding the suggested limit of 100 aguments, regardless of whether or not the later checks verify_control_flow() and verify_mem_flow pass.
>
> Daniel Skantz has updated the pull request incrementally with two additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - comment
>  - changes

Thanks for addressing my comments, Daniel! Please re-test to ensure the new limit is OK on all Oracle's internal test configurations.

-------------

Marked as reviewed by rcastanedalo (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26685#pullrequestreview-3110462641