RFR: 8329077: C2 SuperWord: Add MoveD2L, MoveL2D, MoveF2I, MoveI2F [v4]

[Galder Zamarreño]

On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 09:56:29 GMT, Emanuel Peter <epeter at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Merged and pushed latest master changes, all looks good still
>
> @galderz I got a failure  in out testing:
> 
> With VM flag: `-XX:UseAVX=1`.
> 
> 
> Failed IR Rules (2) of Methods (2)
> ----------------------------------
> 1) Method "static java.lang.Object[] compiler.loopopts.superword.TestCompatibleUseDefTypeSize.test6(int[],float[])" - [Failed IR rules: 1]:
>    * @IR rule 1: "@compiler.lib.ir_framework.IR(phase={DEFAULT}, applyIfPlatformAnd={}, applyIfCPUFeatureOr={"sse4.1", "true", "asimd", "true", "rvv", "true"}, counts={"_#V#LOAD_VECTOR_F#_", "> 0", "_#STORE_VECTOR#_", "> 0", "_#VECTOR_REINTERPRET#_", "> 0"}, applyIfPlatformOr={}, applyIfPlatform={"64-bit", "true"}, failOn={}, applyIfOr={}, applyIfCPUFeatureAnd={}, applyIf={}, applyIfCPUFeature={}, applyIfAnd={}, applyIfNot={})"
>      > Phase "PrintIdeal":
>        - counts: Graph contains wrong number of nodes:
>          * Constraint 1: "(\\d+(\\s){2}(LoadVector.*)+(\\s){2}===.*vector[A-Za-z]<F,8>)"
>            - Failed comparison: [found] 0 > 0 [given]
>            - No nodes matched!
> 
> 2) Method "static java.lang.Object[] compiler.loopopts.superword.TestCompatibleUseDefTypeSize.test9(long[],double[])" - [Failed IR rules: 1]:
>    * @IR rule 1: "@compiler.lib.ir_framework.IR(phase={DEFAULT}, applyIfPlatformAnd={}, applyIfCPUFeatureOr={"sse4.1", "true", "asimd", "true", "rvv", "true"}, counts={"_#V#LOAD_VECTOR_D#_", "> 0", "_#STORE_VECTOR#_", "> 0", "_#VECTOR_REINTERPRET#_", "> 0"}, applyIfPlatformOr={}, applyIfPlatform={"64-bit", "true"}, failOn={}, applyIfOr={}, applyIfCPUFeatureAnd={}, applyIf={}, applyIfCPUFeature={}, applyIfAnd={}, applyIfNot={})"
>      > Phase "PrintIdeal":
>        - counts: Graph contains wrong number of nodes:
>          * Constraint 1: "(\\d+(\\s){2}(LoadVector.*)+(\\s){2}===.*vector[A-Za-z]<D,4>)"
>            - Failed comparison: [found] 0 > 0 [given]
>            - No nodes matched!
> 
> 
> I suspect that `test6` with `floatToRawIntBits` and `test9` with `doubleToRawLongBits` are only supported with `AVX2`. Question is if that is really supposed to be like that, or if we should even file an RFE to extend support for `AVX1` and lower.
> 
> Can you find out why we don't vectorize with `AVX1` here?

@eme64 I've replicated the failure. Looking into it

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26457#issuecomment-3231836866