RFR: 8349559: ci doesn't need to store protection domain
Vladimir Ivanov
vlivanov at openjdk.org
Thu Feb 6 21:53:09 UTC 2025
On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 17:14:44 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <coleenp at openjdk.org> wrote:
> The compiler interface has a protection_domain field that it uses for matching in its version of not-yet loaded classes, but class loading only uses (class, class-loader) as an identifier for loaded classes so the compiler interface should do the same. From the code, I can't see any situation where the protection_domain wouldn't match if name and class loader match.
> Tested with tier1-7.
Nice cleanup! Looks good.
-------------
Marked as reviewed by vlivanov (Reviewer).
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23496#pullrequestreview-2600079707
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list