RFR: 8330851: C2: More efficient TypeFunc creation [v8]

[Amit Kumar]

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 09:29:48 GMT, Dean Long <dlong at openjdk.org> wrote:

>>> I can follow the same approach I followed for `CallNode` and `ArrayCopyNode` structure, if that would be fine ? I also feel that same change can be done for `CallNode` and `ArrayCopyNode` as they also need their own initializer. I am fine with both, fixing it here or fixing with separate RFE.
>> 
>> Up to you. No strong preferences on my side. I'm fine with the current shape of the patch.
>
> I ran testing and it passed and it looks like @iwanowww also ran testing that passed, so you should be OK to integrate.

Thanks for the update @dean-long. I don't see issues on s390x as well.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/21782#issuecomment-2597905091