RFR: 8354727: CompilationPolicy creates too many compiler threads when code cache space is scarce [v2]

[Manuel Hässig]

On Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:35:19 GMT, Manuel Hässig <mhaessig at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> # Issue Summary
>> 
>> Running 
>> 
>> java -XX:+SegmentedCodeCache -XX:ReservedCodeCacheSize=10M -XX:NonNMethodCodeHeapSize=6M \
>>      -XX:ProfiledCodeHeapSize=5M -XX:NonProfiledCodeHeapSize=5M -version
>> 
>> on a machine with more than 255 cores, this would fail with the message that the specified `NonNMethodCodeHeapSize` is too small to fit all compiler buffers (instead of failing because the sum of the heaps is larger than the `ReservedCodeCacheSize`). Hence, the calculated compiler count is too high. This is due to  `CompilationPolicy::initialize()` checking how many compiler buffers fit into the `ReservedCodeCacheSize`. However, in the case above, this is significantly larger than `NonNMethodCodeHeapSize` and causes a new check introduced in #17244 to fail.
>> 
>> # Changes
>> 
>> This PR fixes the calculation of the `CICompilerCount` ergonomic. Firstly, @shipilev kindly provided a fix for the compiler buffer size used in the calculation is also correct if we only have C2. Secondly,`NonNMethodHeapSize`is used as the maximum buffers size available for compilers buffers instead of `ReservedCodeCacheSize` if it was provided as a commandline flag.
>> 
>> It might be debatable if this is the correct fix, since the `NonNMethodHeap` can spill into the other heaps if it is too small. However, I am of the opinion that if the `NonNMethodHeapSize` is explicitly specified, then the compiler count should be calculated accordingly.
>> 
>> # Testing
>> 
>>  - [x] [GHA](https://github.com/mhaessig/jdk/actions/runs/15603409859)
>>  - [x] tier1 and tier2 plus Oracle internal testing on our supported platforms
>>  - [x] tier1 with a manually fixed core count of 288 (this reproduced the problem before the fix)
>
> Manuel Hässig has refreshed the contents of this pull request, and previous commits have been removed. Incremental views are not available.

I made this dependent on #25791 and rebased onto it.

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25770#issuecomment-2969785767