RFR: 8351392: C2 crash: failed: Expected Bool, but got OpaqueMultiversioning [v3]
Abdelhak Zaaim
duke at openjdk.org
Sat Mar 8 16:00:53 UTC 2025
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 14:32:16 GMT, Emanuel Peter <epeter at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> With https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23865 I mark the `OpaqueMultiversioning` useless once there are no loops for the multiversioning any more. The idea was that this way the `multiversion_if` would be folded away once the loops are gone, and then we should not encounter the `OpaqueMultiversioning` in `PhaseIdealLoop::conditional_move`.
>>
>> But there is a case where we do not remove the `OpaqueMultiversioning` fast enough, see the attached regression test:
>> - The loops disappear during IGVN.
>> - At the beginning of the next loop-opts we mark the `OpaqueMultiversioning` as useless.
>> - Later during loop-opts we encounter the useless `OpaqueMultiversioning` in `PhaseIdealLoop::conditional_move`, and assert.
>> - But in the IGVN after this loop-opts phase we would have constant folded the `OpaqueMultiversioning` and `multiversion_if` anyway... we just did not get there fast enough ;)
>>
>> Hence I propose to just create an explicit bailout for useless `OpaqueMultiversioning` nodes in `PhaseIdealLoop::conditional_move`.
>
> Emanuel Peter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>
> Update test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/loopopts/superword/TestMultiversionRemoveUselessSlowLoop.java
>
> Co-authored-by: Tobias Hartmann <tobias.hartmann at oracle.com>
Marked as reviewed by abdelhak-zaaim at github.com (no known OpenJDK username).
-------------
PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23943#pullrequestreview-2669217021
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list