RFR: 8340093: C2 SuperWord: implement cost model [v3]
Emanuel Peter
epeter at openjdk.org
Wed Nov 5 09:50:49 UTC 2025
On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 18:19:29 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov <kvn at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Emanuel Peter has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision:
>>
>> More comments for SirYwell
>
> This looks fine and not complex. I have only nit picks.
@vnkozlov Thanks for reviewing and the suggestions. I renamed some cost functions, and I like it better this way now too :)
> src/hotspot/share/opto/vectorization.cpp line 572:
>
>> 570:
>> 571: // Compute the cost over all operations in the (scalar) loop.
>> 572: float VLoopAnalyzer::cost() const {
>
> consider renaming it to `cost_for_scalar()` and `cost_for_scalar()` to `cost_for_scalar_node()`
I'll do some renamings to make it explicit which are for nodes, and which for the loop.
> src/hotspot/share/opto/vectorization.cpp line 580:
>
>> 578:
>> 579: float sum = 0;
>> 580: for (int j = 0; j < body().body().length(); j++) {
>
> What is `body().body()` mean?
`VLoopAnalyzer` (`this`) has multiple analysis subcomponents. One of them is the `VLoopBody`, i.e. `this->body()` / `this->_body.` And it has access to a `GrowableArray` `body()`, which maps the nodes of the loop.
Maybe `loopBody().nodes()` would sound better here. If you prefer that, I file a separate renaming RFE.
-------------
PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27803#issuecomment-3490211351
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27803#discussion_r2493712328
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27803#discussion_r2493630689
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list