RFR: 8370405: C2: mismatched store from MergeStores wrongly scalarized in allocation elimination

Emanuel Peter epeter at openjdk.org
Wed Oct 29 16:40:14 UTC 2025


On Wed, 29 Oct 2025 16:20:51 GMT, Emanuel Peter <epeter at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> Ah, I see. You are wondering if there should be a `Parse::array_store_check`, why is there not a checkcast so that we cast from `Object` -> `Object (Enumeration)`. Great question. I'll investigate.
>
> Quick summary of investigation:
> 
> The `EncodeP` is the `field_val`:
> 
> (rr) p field_val->dump_bfs(3,0,"#")
> dist dump
> ---------------------------------------------
>    3  303  CallDynamicJava  === 203 299 202 8 1 (10 40 1 1 90 90 69 ) [[ 304 305 306 308 317 316 ]] # Dynamic  java.lang.ClassLoader::findResources java/lang/Object * ( java/security/SecureClassLoader:NotNull *, java/lang/String (java/io/Serializable,java/lang/Comparable,java/lang/CharSequence,java/lang/constant/Constable,java/lang/constant/ConstantDesc):exact * ) ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:42 (line 1445) !jvms: ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:42 (line 1445)
>    3  332  If  === 311 331  [[ 333 334 ]] P=0.999999, C=-1.000000 !jvms: ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:45 (line 1445)
>    2  308  Proj  === 303  [[ 335 330 ]] #5  Oop:java/lang/Object * !jvms: ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:42 (line 1445)
>    2  334  IfTrue  === 332  [[ 376 335 ]] #1 !jvms: ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:45 (line 1445)
>    1  335  CastPP  === 334 308  [[ 358 343 353 ]]  #java/lang/Object:NotNull *  Oop:java/lang/Object:NotNull * !jvms: ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:45 (line 1445)
>    0  358  EncodeP  === _ 335  [[ 359 ]]  #narrowoop: java/lang/Object:NotNull * !jvms: ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:45 (line 1445)
> 
> It seems the value comes from the call, via a projection, and a null-check cast. But I see no type/interface check cast for `Enumeration`.
> 
> This is the store that is being eliminated:
> 
> 359  StoreN  === 377 393 322 358  [[ 365 ]]  @narrowoop: java/lang/Object *[int:>=0] (java/lang/Cloneable,java/io/Serializable)+any * [narrow], idx=6;  Memory: @narrowoop: java/lang/Object (java/util/Enumeration) *[int:2] (java/lang/Cloneable,java/io/Serializable):NotNull:exact[1] *,iid=73 [narrow], idx=12; !jvms: ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:45 (line 1445)
> 
> 
> Tracing back where the store comes from: `Parse::array_store`.
> 
> (rr) p elemtype->dump()
> narrowoop: java/lang/Object (java/util/Enumeration) *
> 
> Inside `Parse::array_store_check` -> `GraphKit::gen_checkcast` we create a null check, with the CastPP we saw above:
> 
> 335  CastPP  === 334 308  [[ 24 ]]  #java/lang/Object:NotNull *  Oop:java/lang/Object:NotNull * !jvms: ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:45 (line 1445)
> 
> 
> More in next comment...

Then we come here:

3355	    // Generate the subtype check
3356	    Node* improved_superklass = superklass;
3357	    if (improved_klass_ptr_type != klass_ptr_type && improved_klass_ptr_type->singleton()) {
3358	      improved_superklass = makecon(improved_klass_ptr_type);
3359	    }
3360	    Node* not_subtype_ctrl = gen_subtype_check(not_null_obj, improved_superklass);
3361	
3362	    // Plug in success path into the merge
3363	    cast_obj = _gvn.transform(new CheckCastPPNode(control(), not_null_obj, toop));

This gives us a `cast_obj` that knows about `Enumeration`:

350  CheckCastPP  === 348 335  [[ ]]  #java/lang/Object (java/util/Enumeration):NotNull *  Oop:java/lang/Object (java/util/Enumeration):NotNull * !jvms: ClassLoader::getResources @ bci:45 (line 1445)

So things are looking promising for now, `res` is that `350 CheckCastPP`. But out in `array_store`, this is not what gets picked up when we do: `val = pop();`.
Instead we get the null-check only `335  CastPP`. So somehow it must have been lost?
Tracking the slot, I see that `Parse::array_store_check` does `replace_in_map(value, cast);`.
But we don't seem to do that for `GraphKit::gen_checkcast`.

@merykitty @rwestrel  Maybe we should investigate this separately from this bugfix here?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27997#discussion_r2474210489


More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev mailing list