RFR: 8361702: C2: assert(is_dominator(compute_early_ctrl(limit, limit_ctrl), pre_end)) failed: node pinned on loop exit test? [v7]

[Christian Hagedorn]

On Tue, 9 Sep 2025 08:39:37 GMT, Roland Westrelin <roland at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> A node in a pre loop only has uses out of the loop dominated by the
>> loop exit. `PhaseIdealLoop::try_sink_out_of_loop()` sets its control
>> to the loop exit projection. A range check in the main loop has this
>> node as input (through a chain of some other nodes). Range check
>> elimination needs to update the exit condition of the pre loop with an
>> expression that depends on the node pinned on its exit: that's
>> impossible and the assert fires. This is a variant of 8314024 (this
>> one was for a node with uses out of the pre loop on multiple paths). I
>> propose the same fix: leave the node with control in the pre loop in
>> this case.
>
> Roland Westrelin has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains 11 additional commits since the last revision:
> 
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8361702
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8361702
>  - review
>  - Merge branch 'master' into JDK-8361702
>  - Update src/hotspot/share/opto/loopopts.cpp
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn at oracle.com>
>  - Update test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/rangechecks/TestSunkRangeFromPreLoopRCE3.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn at oracle.com>
>  - Update test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/rangechecks/TestSunkRangeFromPreLoopRCE2.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn at oracle.com>
>  - Update src/hotspot/share/opto/loopopts.cpp
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn at oracle.com>
>  - Update test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/rangechecks/TestSunkRangeFromPreLoopRCE2.java
>    
>    Co-authored-by: Christian Hagedorn <christian.hagedorn at oracle.com>
>  - tests
>  - ... and 1 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/3ba2cf5f...91a7d73c

Testing looked good!

-------------

PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26424#issuecomment-3280625737