RFR: 8366444: Add support for add/mul reduction operations for Float16 [v5]
Emanuel Peter
epeter at openjdk.org
Mon Jan 26 16:54:46 UTC 2026
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 16:45:43 GMT, Emanuel Peter <epeter at openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Bhavana Kilambi has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains seven additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Address review comments for the JTREG test and microbenchmark
>> - Merge branch 'master'
>> - Address review comments
>> - Fix build failures on Mac
>> - Address review comments
>> - Merge 'master'
>> - 8366444: Add support for add/mul reduction operations for Float16
>>
>> This patch adds mid-end support for vectorized add/mul reduction
>> operations for half floats. It also includes backend aarch64 support for
>> these operations. Only vectorization support through autovectorization
>> is added as VectorAPI currently does not support Float16 vector species.
>>
>> Both add and mul reduction vectorized through autovectorization mandate
>> the implementation to be strictly ordered. The following is how each of
>> these reductions is implemented for different aarch64 targets -
>>
>> For AddReduction :
>> On Neon only targets (UseSVE = 0): Generates scalarized additions
>> using the scalar "fadd" instruction for both 8B and 16B vector lengths.
>> This is because Neon does not provide a direct instruction for computing
>> strictly ordered floating point add reduction.
>>
>> On SVE targets (UseSVE > 0): Generates the "fadda" instruction which
>> computes add reduction for floating point in strict order.
>>
>> For MulReduction :
>> Both Neon and SVE do not provide a direct instruction for computing
>> strictly ordered floating point multiply reduction. For vector lengths
>> of 8B and 16B, a scalarized sequence of scalar "fmul" instructions is
>> generated and multiply reduction for vector lengths > 16B is not
>> supported.
>>
>> Below is the performance of the two newly added microbenchmarks in
>> Float16OperationsBenchmark.java tested on three different aarch64
>> machines and with varying MaxVectorSize -
>>
>> Note: On all machines, the score (ops/ms) is compared with the master
>> branch without this patch which generates a sequence of loads ("ldrsh")
>> to load the FP16 value into an FPR and a scalar "fadd/fmul" to
>> add/multiply the loaded value to the running sum/product. The ratios
>> given below are the ratios between the throughput with this patch and
>> the throughput without this patch.
>> Ratio > 1 indicate...
>
> src/hotspot/cpu/aarch64/c2_MacroAssembler_aarch64.cpp line 1940:
>
>> 1938: }
>> 1939: BLOCK_COMMENT("} neon_reduce_add_fp16");
>> 1940: }
>
> Given that the reduction order is sequential: why do you see any speedup in your benchmarks, comparing scalar to vector performance? How do you explain it? I'm just curious ;)
Also: why not allow a vector with only 2 elements? Is there some restriction here?
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27526#discussion_r2728407382
More information about the hotspot-compiler-dev
mailing list