HotSpot build problems on Windows
Y Srinivas Ramakrishna
Y.S.Ramakrishna at Sun.COM
Fri Nov 14 10:47:40 PST 2008
> >As Christian pointed out there's a .cpp as well as a .hpp that have
> >to go. Then you may want to scan the includeDB's and shuffle include's
> >around if/as needed.
> >
> >
>
> Is there something particular you had in mind with regard
> to the includeDB's? Those files don't include paths so
> not sure what needs adjusting.
No, that looks good. I wanted us to make sure that redundant
concurrentGCThread.cpp's include's weren't left around in includeBD_concurrentMarkSweep. But that appears not to be the
case based on yr grep below. Thanks for checking!
-- ramki
>
> grep concurrentGCThread includeDB_*
> includeDB_gc_concurrentMarkSweep:concurrentMarkSweepThread.hpp
>
> concurrentGCThread.hpp
> includeDB_gc_g1:concurrentG1RefineThread.hpp
> concurrentGCThread.hpp
> includeDB_gc_g1:concurrentMarkThread.hpp
> concurrentGCThread.hpp
> includeDB_gc_g1:concurrentZFThread.hpp
> concurrentGCThread.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:concurrentGCThread.cpp
> concurrentGCThread.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:concurrentGCThread.cpp init.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:concurrentGCThread.cpp
> instanceRefKlass.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:concurrentGCThread.cpp
> interfaceSupport.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:concurrentGCThread.cpp java.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:concurrentGCThread.cpp javaCalls.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:concurrentGCThread.cpp oop.inline.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:concurrentGCThread.cpp
> systemDictionary.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:concurrentGCThread.hpp thread.hpp
> includeDB_gc_shared:gcOverheadReporter.cpp
> concurrentGCThread.hpp
> includeDB_gc_parallel:safepoint.cpp
> concurrentGCThread.hpp
>
> >-- ramki
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Jon Masamitsu <Jon.Masamitsu at Sun.COM>
> >Date: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:35 am
> >Subject: Re: HotSpot build problems on Windows
> >To: Christian Wimmer <wimmer at ssw.jku.at>
> >Cc: hotspot-dev at openjdk.java.net
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>As Christian has found we have in a repository
> >>
> >>./share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/concurrentGCThread.cpp
> >>./share/vm/gc_implementation/shared/concurrentGCThread.cpp
> >>
> >>The files are the same now. I'm guessing that we
> >>should delete
> >>
> >>./share/vm/gc_implementation/concurrentMarkSweep/concurrentGCThread.cpp
> >>
> >>I'll see if I can tell mercurial to do that. Any concerns? Were
> >>there any
> >>thoughts that concurrentGCThread.cpp should be split between
> >>CMS and shared (i.e., that there is some code in concurrentGCThread.cpp
> >>specialized for CMS)?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Christian Wimmer wrote On 11/13/08 21:06,:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>...
> >>>2) duplicate files: the files "concurrentGCThread.cpp" and
> >>>"concurrentGCThread.hpp" are present in two directories:
> >>>"gc_implementation\concurrentMarkSweep" and "gc_implementation
> >>>\shared". The content of the files is equal, so just deleting one
> >>>
> >>>
> >>pair
> >>
> >>
> >>>of files works.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list