Request for review (M): 6778669: Patch from Red Hat -- fixes compilation errors

[Vladimir Kozlov]

Changes looks good.
Can you just rename (add prefix/suffix) methods defined in MatchRule
to avoid the warnings?

Vladimir

Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:43 -0800, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
>> Given the way that NameList is being abused in the code, I think (int) 
>> (intptr_t) preserves the intent of storing ints so I think I prefer  
>> your patch below.
> 
> Here is the second version of the patch:
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~twisti/6778669/webrev.01/
> 
> I added +w to the SunCC compiler flags to find all bugs that GCC could
> probably complain about.  I will remove that flag before commit unless I
> can fix the remaining warnings like these:
> 
> "/export/home/twisti/hotspot-comp/6778669/src/share/vm/adlc/formssel.hpp", line 1017: Warning: MatchRule::append_components hides the function MatchNode::append_components(FormDict&, ComponentList&, bool) const.
> "/export/home/twisti/hotspot-comp/6778669/src/share/vm/adlc/formssel.hpp", line 1017: Warning: MatchRule::cisc_spill_match hides the function MatchNode::cisc_spill_match(FormDict&, RegisterForm*, MatchNode*, const char*&, const char*&).
> "/export/home/twisti/hotspot-comp/6778669/src/share/vm/adlc/formssel.hpp", line 1017: Warning: MatchRule::equivalent hides the function MatchNode::equivalent(FormDict&, MatchNode*).
> "/export/home/twisti/hotspot-comp/6778669/src/share/vm/adlc/formssel.hpp", line 1017: Warning: MatchRule::swap_commutative_op hides the function MatchNode::swap_commutative_op(bool, int).
> 
> Unfortunately I don't know how to fix them properly.  But it would be
> nice to have the +w flag in there as it found a lot of "bugs", like the
> printf ones.
> 
> -- Christian
>