identifier name clash between hotspot and glibc

Omair Majid omajid at redhat.com
Fri Oct 21 07:10:49 PDT 2011


On 10/20/2011 02:18 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Omair Majid wrote:
>> From this, it sounds like hotspot should not be using these
>> identifiers. A search for '#define __' shows about 81 matches [3],
>> but only __LEAF is causing a problem right now.
>
> most of those are defines of __ by itself which while dubious is a
> widespread idiom and doesn't appear likely to clash, or at least I
> don't want to change it until we have to.  The remaining ones seem
> pretty benign so I think we can leave them alone until we have
> problems.
>
>>
>> Does anyone have any thoughts on how I should go about fixing it?
>> Does renaming __LEAF to something like VM_LEAF or even LEAF__ make
>> sense?
>
> VM_LEAF_BASE makes sense to me.  Can you fix __ENTRY and
> __QUICK_ENTRY similarly?  I filed 7103224 for this.
>

Thanks for the suggestions. I have posted a webrev at:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~omajid/webrevs/7103224-glibc-name-clash/webrev.01/

It is against hg.openjdk.java.net/hsx/hotspot-main/. I couldnt get the 
entire JDK to compile - I ran into build issues with jaxws (I am not 
sure how buildable this tree is right now). 'make hotspot' worked fine.

Thanks,
Omair


More information about the hotspot-dev mailing list