Build Breakage with latest HotSpot on gcc 4.7
Andrew Hughes
ahughes at redhat.com
Wed Aug 1 04:10:09 PDT 2012
----- Original Message -----
> On 1/08/2012 7:21 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> This seems fine to me.
> >>
> >> Weird thing is I'm certain I've seen this patch before! But now I
> >> can't find the email, or any trace of it. Frustrating.
> >>
> >
> > Could it have been:
> >
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2012-May/005945.html
> >
> > which was the same failure, but in a different file (TreeDictionary
> > rather than hashtable.{c,h}pp?
>
> No it was:
>
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-runtime-dev/2012-July/004153.html
>
> It is strange that these gcc failures are coming in piece-meal. I
> would
> have expected everyone to hit the full set of failures.
>
AFAIR, it was fixed for a time after the May fix. This seems to be a new regression.
unlink_entry(p) (rather than this->unlink_entry(p)) comes from:
changeset: 3426:e9140bf80b4a
parent: 3410:4d399f013e5a
user: coleenp
date: Wed Jun 13 19:52:59 2012 -0400
summary: 7158800: Improve storage of symbol tables
according to hg annotate.
> David
>
>
> >> David
> >>
> >> On 1/08/2012 3:56 AM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> The following changes:
> >>>
> >>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/hotspot/webrev.04/
> >>>
> >>> were required to get HotSpot to build again with GCC 4.7
> >>> (solutions
> >>> suggested by the gcc errors). Builds of both the build and
> >>> hotspot-comp
> >>> forest showed the same issue.
> >>>
> >>> Can we get this fix in ASAP please?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>
> >
>
--
Andrew :)
Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list