RFR: Some build fixes for gcc4.7

[David Holmes]

I think the library_call issue is the only thing that still needs 
working on.

David

On 12/12/2012 8:17 AM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
>
> On 12/11/2012 05:00 PM, Roman Kennke wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 11.12.2012, 16:53 -0500 schrieb Coleen Phillimore:
>>> Now I hit this library_call.cpp compilation error. Has it been pushed
>>> yet? I was going to piggyback this with another cleanup that I was
>>> making if not.
>> No, it has not been pushed yet. :-(
>>
>> Seems like all my patches have become stuck in the queue. Is there
>> anything that I can do to make them move forward? Should I file them in
>> openjdk bugzilla?
>
> What you are doing is the right way to submit patches. We don't really
> monitor openjdk bugzilla. I think people are working on your other patches.
>
> thanks,
> Coleen
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Roman
>>
>>> thanks,
>>> Coleen
>>>
>>> On 12/07/2012 11:28 AM, Roman Kennke wrote:
>>>> Am Donnerstag, den 06.12.2012, 18:40 -0500 schrieb Coleen Phillimore:
>>>>> The changes to binaryTreeDictionary.cpp are already in the hotspot-gc
>>>>> repository and will/have been pushed up to main already. They should
>>>>> already be in hotspot-comp.
>>>> Ah great, good to see, thanks! :-)
>>>>
>>>>> Which compiler complains about the library_call.cpp changes? I have an
>>>>> unstable ubuntu 12.10 system in order to run with gcc 4.7.2 and this
>>>>> file compiles fine for me as is.
>>>> This happens on Fedora, gcc 4.7.2. Fedora tends to incorporate
>>>> improvements from dev versions sometimes... I agree with David, it
>>>> would
>>>> be good to fix in any case.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Roman
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>