Code review request: JDK-8005048,NMT: #loaded classes needs to just show the # defined classes
Zhengyu Gu
zhengyu.gu at oracle.com
Tue Dec 18 06:53:58 PST 2012
Hi Vitaly,
Thanks for reviewing.
On 12/17/2012 7:24 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
>
> Hi Zhengyu,
>
> In GenerationData::reset() you delete _recorder_list. Since this list
> is built from callers (I.e. caller adds recorders) is it good to
> delete the head here? I guess this class takes ownership of added
> recorders?
>
Yes, releasing recorder via MemTracker::release_thread_recorder() is
cleaner solution, I will make change.
> If so, who deletes the rest of the recorders in the list? I'd expect
> to see a loop here deleting all recorders in the list.
>
Recorder deletion in coded in recursive manner, in
MemRecorer::~MemRecorder()
if (_next != NULL) delete _next;
Thanks,
-Zhengyu
> Thanks
>
> Sent from my phone
>
> On Dec 17, 2012 3:12 PM, "Zhengyu Gu" <zhengyu.gu at oracle.com
> <mailto:zhengyu.gu at oracle.com>> wrote:
>
> Current NMT implementation reports number of loaded classes at
> query time, but number of defined classes is what is expected.
>
> This changset reflects two major changes:
>
> 1. It counts number of defined classes vs. number of loaded classes
> 2. It counts number of defined classes for each generation, vs.
> counts at query time. In this way, the number of defined classes
> that NMT reports, should match the corresponding class metadata
> data. As the result, the data should be more accurate.
>
>
> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8005048/webrev.00/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ezgu/8005048/webrev.00/>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Zhengyu
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list