Code review request: JDK-8005048, NMT: #loaded classes needs to just show the # defined classes
Karen Kinnear
karen.kinnear at oracle.com
Thu Dec 20 11:35:02 PST 2012
Zhengyu.
Looks good and thank you.
instanceKlass.cpp line 370
deplicated -> duplicated
thanks,
Karen
On Dec 20, 2012, at 2:12 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
> Round 3: also decrement instance counter when unloads class loader data.
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8005048/webrev.02/
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Zhengyu
>
> On 12/18/2012 2:59 PM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I updated the webrev to reflect the suggestions.
>>
>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8005048/webrev.01/
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -Zhengyu
>>
>>
>> On 12/18/2012 10:39 AM, Zhengyu Gu wrote:
>>> Not likely, but I will convert it to loop, just to eliminate the concerns ...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -Zhengyu
>>>
>>> On 12/18/2012 10:34 AM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
>>>>
>>>> By the way, no chance of blowing the stack here if small stack size is used, right?
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my phone
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 18, 2012 10:31 AM, "Vitaly Davidovich" <vitalyd at gmail.com <mailto:vitalyd at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ah yes, I see the destructor in MemRecorder now - thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my phone
>>>>
>>>> On Dec 18, 2012 9:54 AM, "Zhengyu Gu" <zhengyu.gu at oracle.com
>>>> <mailto:zhengyu.gu at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Vitaly,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for reviewing.
>>>>
>>>> On 12/17/2012 7:24 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Zhengyu,
>>>>>
>>>>> In GenerationData::reset() you delete _recorder_list. Since
>>>>> this list is built from callers (I.e. caller adds recorders)
>>>>> is it good to delete the head here? I guess this class takes
>>>>> ownership of added recorders?
>>>>>
>>>> Yes, releasing recorder via
>>>> MemTracker::release_thread_recorder() is cleaner solution, I
>>>> will make change.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> If so, who deletes the rest of the recorders in the list? I'd
>>>>> expect to see a loop here deleting all recorders in the list.
>>>>>
>>>> Recorder deletion in coded in recursive manner, in
>>>> MemRecorer::~MemRecorder()
>>>>
>>>> if (_next != NULL) delete _next;
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> -Zhengyu
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my phone
>>>>>
>>>>> On Dec 17, 2012 3:12 PM, "Zhengyu Gu" <zhengyu.gu at oracle.com
>>>>> <mailto:zhengyu.gu at oracle.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Current NMT implementation reports number of loaded
>>>>> classes at query time, but number of defined classes is
>>>>> what is expected.
>>>>>
>>>>> This changset reflects two major changes:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. It counts number of defined classes vs. number of
>>>>> loaded classes
>>>>> 2. It counts number of defined classes for each
>>>>> generation, vs. counts at query time. In this way, the
>>>>> number of defined classes that NMT reports, should match
>>>>> the corresponding class metadata data. As the result, the
>>>>> data should be more accurate.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Webrev:
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~zgu/8005048/webrev.00/
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ezgu/8005048/webrev.00/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> -Zhengyu
>>>>>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list