RFR (M): CR 8003985: Support @Contended Annotation - JEP 142

[Aleksey Shipilev]

Yes I did, Coleen, thanks for additional review. I will try to
address/revisit these along with other issues outlined in other reviews.
Stay tuned for another webrev coming :)

-Aleksey.

On 11/30/2012 04:19 PM, Coleen Phillimore wrote:
> 
> I sent a code review of this code also, did you see it?  I am very
> concerned with the additional footprint that this allocates for
> contended flags for each field.   Did I read this code correctly? I
> don't think this code can be pushed until this is resolved.
> Thanks,
> Coleen
> 
> On 11/30/2012 5:44 AM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
>> On 11/30/2012 07:35 AM, David Holmes wrote:
>>> This work can not be pushed until the JEP has moved to the Funded state.
>> So... How should one move it to the Funded state?
>>
>>> I'd also like to know what testing has been done so far from the regular
>>> hotspot testsuites. There may be places where layout assumptions are
>>> being made eg oops first.
>> Are JPRT acceptance tests enough, or we should do the out-of-cycle VM
>> testing before the integration?
>>
>> -Aleksey.
>>
>