Review request:7197210: java/lang/invoke/CallSiteTest.java failing on armsflt
Jiangli Zhou
jiangli.zhou at oracle.com
Mon Oct 29 09:37:08 PDT 2012
Hi Alan,
Thanks a lot for those information. I'm discussing with Christian in a
separate thread regarding this issue.
Thanks,
Jiangli
On 10/28/2012 06:59 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 27/10/2012 00:52, Jiangli Zhou wrote:
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> I tried a few experiments with the makefiles. Looks like
>> jdk/make/java/invoke/Makefile is not the right place to set the
>> -timeoutFactor option. I'm reluctant to set a large timeoutFactor in
>> jdk/test/Makefile. Some of the java.lang.invoke jtreg test take long
>> time to run. For example, the test.java.lang.invoke.MethodHandlesTest
>> takes about 1.5 hour to run on certain devices. Since there are only
>> 3~4 java.lang.invoke tests have the timeout issue and each of them
>> has very different execution duration, I'm inclined to set each
>> specific timeout value for different test. Please let me know your
>> opinion.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jiangli
>>
> If you are running the tests via the make file then this should work:
>
> make EXTRA_JTREG_OPTIONS=-timeoutFactor:10 jdk_lang
>
> but I see that the Makefile puts its own defaults,
> including-timeoutFactor:4, after the options set via
> EXTRA_JTREG_OPTIONS. That plus jtreg doesn't allow the -timeoutFactor
> to be specified more than once on the command line. Minimally we
> should fix the make file so that options specified via
> EXTRA_JTREG_OPTIONS override any defaults in the make file.
>
> I think you'll need to check with Christian or John as to whether they
> would object to have very high timeouts on these tests. Personally I
> think it should be possible to specify a timeout scaling factor when
> running the tests rather than having each test specify a /timeout for
> the slowest possible machine that the test might run on.
>
> -Alan.
>
>
>
>
More information about the hotspot-dev
mailing list