RFR: Some build fixes for gcc4.7

[Roman Kennke]

Am Donnerstag, den 13.12.2012, 12:41 -0800 schrieb Christian Thalinger:
> On Dec 12, 2012, at 12:19 AM, Roman Kennke <rkennke at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi David,
> > 
> >> From my perspective, there are the following proposed changes not
> > committed yet:
> > 
> > 1.
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2012-November/007294.html
> > 
> >> From that one, only the jdk part is missing:
> > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rkennke/shark/webrev-jdk-00/
> > 
> > I think it's the only one with a bug-id even:
> > 8003868: fix shark for latest HotSpot and LLVM
> > 
> > 2. Then there is the library_call build fixes. (Which have also been
> > proposed by Yasumasa Suenaga, which now got the bug id 8004898 and
> > Christian is working on it.)
> > 
> > Then I posted a bunch of others on hotspot-compiler-dev (maybe
> > hotspot-dev would have been better?)
> > 
> > 3. Fix OSR in Shark for non-empty incoming stack
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2012-December/009087.html
> > 
> > This one got a little review by David Chase, for which I will send an
> > updated webrev soon. I was hoping to get some more feedback though, or
> > even a bug-id.
> > 
> > 4. Implement deoptimization support in Shark
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2012-December/009088.html
> > 
> > This one did not get any feedback yet, no bug-id either.
> > 
> > 5. Fix volatile float field access in Shark 
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2012-December/009089.html
> > 
> > Same, no feedback, no bug-id.
> > 
> > 6. Enable JSR292 support in Shark
> > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-compiler-dev/2012-December/009090.html
> > 
> > Got some positive feedback from John Rose, but no bug id and no
> > progress.
> > 
> > Please let me know if I should do anything different in the future
> > (different mailing list, different format, ..) Also, if it helps, I can
> > group all those changes into one big change, I just thought that it is
> > easier to review in logical chunks (otherwise the changes would
> > interleave and it's difficult to say what belongs to what).
> 
> Currently we have some problems with JPRT so I waiting for that to be resolved.  But I will take care of all the above.

Hi,

Is there any progress on these issues? Maybe at least give it a Bug ID
so it's not forgotten?

Best regards,
Roman