RFR (S): CR 8012939: @Contended doesn't work correctly with inheritance

[Vladimir Kozlov]

On 5/13/13 2:23 PM, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> On 05/14/2013 01:15 AM, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
>> Calculation of orig_nonstatic_field_size variable is also wrong. It
>> does not take into account fields padding. But it is not important.
>> We can skip PrintCompactFieldsSavings code if class or its fields are
>> contended because we don't care about compaction in such case.
>
> That, btw, makes me wonder: do we care about PrintCompactFieldsSavings
> anymore? Can we purge it to make the field layout code more readable?

It was used during fields reordering work but I doubt anyone used it 
since then. We can get similar info from fields layout output.

I agree with removing it but as separate RFE changes.

Vladimir

>
> -Aleksey.
>